User talk:Jim1138/Archive 7

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

I've requested temporary semi-protection, after the seventh introduction of the spurious edits that you're familiar with. I removed the edits again today. 842U (talk) 12:21, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

Hello.

On the recent BLP issue here, you issued a level one warning to the perpetrator. I issued {{

Replied at my talk page. Thanks. 69.155.143.96 (talk) 04:53, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

Replied again. Thanks. 69.155.143.96 (talk) 19:44, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

... what your entry on my talk page is about. Clarify, or I'll delete? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Meduban (talk • contribs) 22:21, 22 July 2012 (UTC)

Hello

I am well, I hope you are as well. Thank you for your kind words. Yes, I erroneously removed the honorifics from book titles and quotes. I try to not do that; it appears I need to be more careful. Thank you for correcting my errors and letting me know. Best Regards Jim1138 (talk) 08:35, 23 July 2012 (UTC)

It's outrageous that you deleted "the first lesbian in space" edit from Sally Ride's bio. It's a crucial part of her biography, inspirational to millions of gay people around the world, and confirmed by press reports and her own company's death announcement today.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/07/23/sally-ride-first-american-woman-female-partner-_n_1696537.html

We're not in the 1960s any more. Being a lesbian - especially a pioneering lesbian - is a source of pride, not of shame. Especially when the person's own company is so open about it.

Shame on you for your bigoted deletion. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Enzuli (talk • contribs) 00:31, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

Unsourced stuff like that gets deleted. Care to guess how many edits of "lesbo" and "faggot" I have deleted? Notice that I did not delete it once it was sourced? Not doing yourself any favors here. Jim1138 (talk) 00:35, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

But it was sourced - in the PERSONAL section. In any event, I added a source now. It's being discussed everywhere. And it's clearly an important part of how she lived and of her legacy. Sorry for imputing bad faith to you, but it was just upsetting to watch that part of her life be banished as though it was bad and wrong when it's the opposite. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Enzuli (talk • contribs) 00:42, 24 July 2012 (UTC)

I just wanted to thank you for undoing the vandalism to my user page. I was having a very positive experience at Wikipedia until that moment. I am most grateful for your swift action taken on my behalf. Best Regards, Snowysusan 11:17, 24 July 2012 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Snowysusan (talk • contribs)

Can we please forget about this whole sock puppetry thing? I am now satisfied with my progress on Wikipedia. Just delete the page and forget about it. Heymister14 (talk) 02:14, 27 July 2012 (UTC)heymister14

The page was not deleted but intentionally redirected to Tuckahoe Marble which is the accurate and verified name for the specific stone that is being discussed. There are no sources to even validate "Westchester Marble" as being an even remotely notable name of a specific rock. Additionally most of the content used in the "Westchester Marble" is taken directly from info. taken directly from "Tuckahoe". If anything Westchester Marble can refer to the marble produced throughout different parts of the county, however, there would be nothing notable about that. The marble of recognition is specifically from the quarry at Tuckahoe, from which the entire development of the town of "Tuckahoe" is based. Tuckahoe Marble is known by name, place of origin, and physical qualities and color. Thanks --66.87.2.231 (talk) 06:59, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

Westchester marble is the original article. If it needs to be moved/renamed, you should perform a move, not a copy / paste. Please see Wikipedia:Moving a page. This is to maintain the article's history. Westchester marble gets 9000 hits in google v. 13,600 for Tuckahoe Marble, so Westchester is not insignificant. I would recommend you discuss it in talk:Westchester marble given the revert history. Jim1138 (talk

) 07:11, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

I do not know why the original article would have ever been Westchester Marble instead of Tuckahoe Marble. Perhaps there were two articles at first a while back? If Westchester Marble is getting more hits than Tuckahoe Marble that might merely have to do with the fact that "Westchester" is a much more widely used search term for people/places/things countywide and therefore would pull up related names/topics like "Westchester Marble" for example.The results for a google search of "Westchester Marble" are almost entirely for private stone supply retailers and contracters within the county with the exception of one result for the intial wikipedia page. A google search for "Tuckahoe Marble" results a number of links specifically related to"Tuckahoe Marble" and its notability and relevance. Additionally the sources and references used in Westchester Marble article are only relevant when in the context of Tu ources used and the need for corrections. 66.87.2.231 (talk) 08:18, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

I am not too concerned about the name of the article. I am concerned about loosing the

wp:page history. It appears that you (or someone) copied the information from Westchester marble and pasted it into Tuckahoe Marble and changed the instances of "Weschester" to "Tuckahoe". Doing so would cause the page history to be lost. Please request a page move instead. BTW: there are more google hits on Tuckahoe than Westchester. I was pointing out that Westchester marble is not insignificant. Please follow Wikipedia:Moving a page to rename Weschester marble. You probably should change Tuckahoe back to a redirect to Weschester for the time being. An administrator will need to do the page move, I believe. Cheers Jim1138 (talk

) 08:28, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

I think it worked. 66.27.112.119 (talk) 00:11, 28 July 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for your assistance with all the elementary school redirects the IP is not understanding. I need to get to sleep.  :))

	The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
	For your keen handling of those disrupting the encyclopedia and tireless efforts to help keep the constant influx of vandalism at bay. Thank you. Calmer Waters 05:18, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

No problem with removing my tag, I was just trying to figure out what the editor is doing. There is a duplicate article at

Oops... I see you caught the duplicate. --

talk

) 19:11, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

I am not gonna call u names or $hit like that, but dont you dare warn me like that again or ill get in $hit loads of trouble k? 81.108.7.13 (talk) 19:28, 29 July 2012 (UTC)

Well its beyond anyone's imagination that such articles are completely worthless, any search on google or google books or for a matter of fact that Sadashiv was issue less and further the article is without any source for over 4 years. Further the only Kashibai in Maratha history is wife of Nana Saheb(Peshwa Balaji Rao). But still you can help me to nominate this article for deletion as an article without any source for 4 years that too its a known fact that sadashiv dont have any child.ARIHANT SUB (talk) 05:01, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

But its malicious contents cannot be maintained most citation tags are their for years, not a single book or scholar mentions anything about any such women. Most probably Some Sikh editors have propped up this from their own fantasy. http://www.google.co.in/webhp?rlz=1C1RNHN_enIN478IN478&sourceid=chrome-instant&ie=UTF-8#hl=en&rlz=1C1RNHN_enIN478IN478&tbm=bks&sclient=psy-ab&q=KASHIBAI+DAUGHTER+SADASHIV&oq=KASHIBAI+DAUGHTER+SADASHIV&gs_l=serp.3...289830.300771.4.300931.40.31.8.1.2.0.211.4384.0j29j2.31.0...0.0...1c.NgtXTTXDj6Q&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.,cf.osb&fp=96224b27fb31dccc&biw=1280&bih=629

No such thing ever existed , infact its surprising that how such an article was maintained for 4 continous years with all the citation tags remaining as it is for years. I dont know the procedure for nominating any article for deletion but the article is completely a fantasy and nothing more than that.ARIHANT SUB (talk) 05:06, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

I am not going to contest

wp:article for deletion to do so. Thank you Jim1138 (talk

) 05:08, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Thats what i am asking how to nominate this article for deletion. Where we have to post this issue. thnx. I am not accusing you as i said that what you said was right according to WP guidelines but that line of Salvaging an article on a Person who never existed was a wrong one. So plz help me in nominating this Ghost Article for deletion. Thnx once again.ARIHANT SUB (talk) 05:11, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

It is more tedious than anything. I'll nominate it if you add information supporting the deletion? I'll leave a link on your talk page. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 05:15, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Jim my mate you are not understanding their is no such Women Like Kashibai Who is daughter of Sadashiv Bhau as he dont have any child at all. Further the responsibility of providing references to claim made in Kashibai article depends on those who have created a Ghost Article on a Ghost Person who never existed in History.

http://www.google.co.in/webhp?rlz=1C1RNHN_enIN478IN478&sourceid=chrome-instant&ie=UTF-8#hl=en&rlz=1C1RNHN_enIN478IN478&tbm=bks&sclient=psy-ab&q=sadashiv+bhau+daughter&oq=sadashiv+bhau+daughter&gs_l=serp.3...41231.48305.2.48384.31.27.4.0.0.0.214.3739.0j25j1.26.0...0.0...1c.7z9Z8XFLCtU&bav=on.2,or.r_gc.r_pw.r_qf.,cf.osb&fp=96224b27fb31dccc&biw=1280&bih=629

No Kashibai reference is found in any book or by any scholar, can you see that Citation tags are as it is for Years and many editors have already raised the intention of such dubious articles. I have nominated it for deletion. ThnxARIHANT SUB (talk) 05:18, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Thnx for all your help, i have restored the article(knowing though its completely false as no such Figure ever existed), so that if anyone specially those who have been bringing shame and unreliability to wikipedia are given fair chance to provide Reliable sources to even prove this point that any such women like Kashibai ever exist who was daughter of Maratha Commander in Chief Sadashivrao Bhau(He and his wife parvatibai were childless). Thnx for guiding me through all the procedure.

ARIHANT SUB (talk) 05:51, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Can you please explain why you deleted the following from the Sorcha Faal entry as i believe their are relavant. Thank you.

Sorcha Faal Report Used By Venezuela President Hugo Chávez A 14 January 2010 report by Sorcha Faal named US Quake Test Goes “Horribly Wrong”, Leaves 500,000 Dead In Haiti http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1322.htm was used http://boardreader.com/thread/Hugo_Chavez_A_U_S_Weapons_Test_Caused_Th_6o4qX7kjr.html by Venezuelan president Hugo Chávez) who accused the United States of using a earthquake “weapon” against Haiti.

References

• Précisions et aléas autour du “complot Jeb Bush”- dedefensa.org
• L’incidente Russo di Tambov, l’Artic Sea ed il volo segreto di Netanyahu a Mosca- agoravox.it
• 媒体盘点2010年十大科学谣言 千年极寒欲翻案- people.com.cn
• Global warming hysteria misplaced- News.com.au

External links

Look up conspiracy theory in Wiktionary, the free dictionary.

• Conspiracy Theories and Misinformation, America.gov
• "The 31 Wildest Conspiracy Theories". LIFE magazine – slideshow.
• Naomi Wolf. "Analysis of the appeal of conspiracy theories with suggestions for more accurate ad hoc internet reporting of them".
• Stuart J. Murray (2009). "Editorial Introduction: 'Media Tropes'". MediaTropes eJournal. 2 (1): i–x.
• Top 10 Right-Wing Conspiracy Theories: by Alexander Zaitchik—Southern Poverty Leadership Conference—Alternet August 15, 2010

Arzk02587k^(talk) 11:17, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Clearly explained in the edit summary and the message on your page. Leave an

wp:edit summary or others can not understand your reasoning. Jim1138 (talk

) 16:16, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Ok, tanks! Att! Braz Leme (talk) 22:58, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

Ok, Jim! Att. Braz Leme (talk) 23:03, 30 July 2012 (UTC)

talk

) 03:00, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Thanks!

		The Userpage Shield
		Thanks for minding my user/talk page Jschnur (talk) 07:24, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Adminship

Hi Jim, have you considered running for adminship? I imagine you have, but I just saw your submission at

08:22, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
	For your consistent effort to keep Wikipedia free from vandalism (etc) and vandals. Fifty seven thousand edits with Huggle is a big achievement. Congratulatons and thank you, Callanecc (talk • contribs) talkback (etc) template appreciated. 09:19, 31 July 2012 (UTC)

Joan Jett Page

Hey, I haven't editied on wikipedia for a while and I've forgotten a lot. While I was in the process of adding a citation, you reverted my first step. And someone else did the same thing moments before. Please give me a chance to FINISH what I'm doing. Thank you!!! Bradkay (talk) 07:03, 27 July 2012 (UTC)

Hello Jim, got your note on my talk page. Thank you for your help on Jett page and the reminder of how to do refs. As above, I'm way out of practice. Thank you again. Bradkay (talk) 03:23, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

Hi Jim1138; I don't want to be tagged for edit warring, nor have the time to pursue this now, but I think we're at the point where either a noticeboard report or request for page protection may be appropriate. I suspect a user block is inevitable. Thanks for helping, 99.137.209.191 (talk) 00:11, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

I don't know that the article is even worth it. Probably nobody reads it anyway. I am pursuing communication... Jim1138 (talk) 00:14, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Hello Jim, sorry for all the trouble but I believe some people in my hometown wish to censor any material that they deem unacceptable. I've noted two songs and a fictional novel that keeps getting deleted. The other stuff I've entered may very well violate your terms but as to the songs and the novel they are both notable and primary sources. Am I missing something here? I am rather fond of my hometown both the good and the bad. tiltedsun88

(Hitting head against wall) Yes, what you're missing has been explained numerous times. The information relates to non-notables, and uses unacceptable sources. I live in Connecticut, and have no idea why anyone would want to censor this--it's plain unencyclopedic. 99.137.209.191 (talk) 00:22, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

It's notable to people who live in this town so I guess keep hitting your head and maybe something will shake loose?? jokin...It's under the interesting facts section which I see as trivia that is not necessarily of historic value. Also, you are not the only one deleting things here. I'm sure there are things about your hometown that are only interesting to you. I kinda like the one song and the other is terrible but then I don't like country music so. Most people in my town pretend the novel does'nt exist so I don't think I can budge on that one in my opinion. Tiltedsun88 — Preceding unsigned comment added by Tiltedsun88 (talk • contribs) 00:30, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

As a longtime editor here I realize it's incumbent upon us to be patient with newcomers.....that said, this has been explained a lot of times already. It doesn't matter a lick whether you or I find the information important. It doesn't meet the encyclopedia's guidelines, which I do wish newcomers would bother reading, so as not to prolong such timesinks.... 99.137.209.191 (talk) 00:36, 1 August 2012 (UTC)

Jim, even if an Indian newspaper put out an article praising a particular translation, that's not a useful evaluation. It's one obscure newspaper; the article could have been written by a friend of the translator; the article could have been based on a press release. The translation list would be useless if it filled up with praise of one or another translation from possibly interested parties. It is useful to know that it was translated in South Asia and that it uses AmE. Zora (talk) 22:38, 2 August 2012 (UTC)

That's fine by me. Think what I left was bad, take a look at what came before diff I was on the fence about deleting the whole entry and left the link in an attempt to differentiate between the many different "The Qur'an" titles in the list.

Would you mind taking a look at this edit? Seems strange diff Thanks for the note. Cheers Jim1138 (talk)

I wondered about that too. It seems as if it's an attempt to attract American Muslims -- perhaps new converts. I wouldn't care if they were converts or women or Americans; I'd care if they were competent and knew their Quranic Arabic. Somehow I don't think that all of these supposed translators can be qualified scholars. I thought about reversing it and then I wasn't sure. I'd almost have to have a copy of the translation in front of me to decide what I think. P.S. I'm not a Muslima; I'm a Buddhist. But I do care a lot about careful scholarship and good translation. Zora (talk) 01:50, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

b1 are 224 teeth, e3 is 223. this is confirmed by modern sources. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 157.24.212.2 (talk) 09:41, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

HI Jim1138. According to http://www.tollundman.dk/et-lig-dukker-op.asp and according to the archaeological literature Tollund Man has been found on Sathurday May 6, 1950 and the find was reported to the police on Tuesday May 8, 1950. Please check the tollundman.dk site again, you will find that the date of the police report was mentioned in figures first and the date of discovery was only mentioned as last Sathurday. Cheers --Bullenwächter (talk) 13:10, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Thank you for fixing my error. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 17:05, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Well, the article is about Silk Road. Silk Road requires registration. Should the normal .onion-url also be removed? I think it is appropriate to refrain from that rule in this case, don't you? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.55.93.112 (talk) 18:30, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

I see your point. I undid my edit. Thanks for the note. I will discuss this with others. Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 18:37, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Already discussed / the link stays:

TOR and did not want to register. Jim1138 (talk

) 18:47, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

I see. But I think the page would become a bit cluttered if [[Tor (anonymity network)|TOR]] registration required where put next to all links to Silk Road. Maybe if we moved the Onion.To and Tor2web.org links to that top-right grey info-box where the normal .onion-URL is. They're pretty darn useful to users who do not have Tor and just wants to see what it's all about. Such a user that would read a wiki-page. One could argue that they should be added to every wiki-page about a .onion-site. Cheers! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.55.93.112 (talk) 19:29, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Putting everything together sounds good. Up for doing it? Thanks Jim1138 (talk) 21:09, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Most of the links to Silk Road were 404, so I commented them out. Added the TOR comment to the link you added. Jim1138 (talk) 22:48, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

I moved the two links up to the infobox. Tor2web seems to be down right now, but they'll probably be back soon. I also put the text "requires registration" next to the text "requires tor" in the infobox, but it seems a out of place. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 84.55.93.112 (talk) 23:26, 3 August 2012 (UTC)

Hey - you deleted my page on sound healing about 1 minute after I posted it. You obviously didn't read it. You're not the Wiki Police, so watch your step. The article is valid. I'm an expert in the field and the original author. Maybe you should READ material before you ban it. It's a valid article, so please leave it up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 113.161.6.24 (talk) 03:59, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

Your removal of Tom Zionkowski is incorrect, he is an extremely notable alum who is cited as the youngest paid dance music producer in the state of illinois . Also as a touring midwestern dj and has been featured in magazines such as MIXMAG and Lets Mix. Also is a pioneer sponsored professional dj and has collaberated with the likes of LIL Jon and Ludacris on and dance anthem For the University of Wisconsin. Also noted for being featured on BBC Radio 1 with DJ Kutski. Also noted official remix of Naturally by Salena Gomez. As well as a feature in the chicago sun times for his sound editing for the acclaimed revitalized version of the documentary "inquiring Nuns". Also produced the entire EP for Booshua a Chicagoan rap artist well known in the college scene. Is signed to multiple record labels with songs on Itunes beatport amazon etc. Also a Ford model, Photographer for the Badger Herald and Capitol Times (madison). And the lead singer of 'They Never Say No' (Songs on itunes and spotify) Simple googling of dj clarity brings up a plethora of articles and pictures/interviews. Please research before deletion/editing! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ghser99 (talk • contribs)

I removed red linked people on a list that had no other references:

wp:listpeople. I note that you changed the link to Tom Zionkowski

which links to an article.

The research is the responsibility of the editor adding the information. It is not my responsibility to research and correct your error. BTW, please follow convention and put new talk entries on the bottom of the page - see Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines Cheers Jim1138 (talk) 19:35, 4 August 2012 (UTC)

YOU UNDID MAH EDIT NOW IMMA BAN U!!--173.218.215.70 (talk) 22:53, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Wtfiswithyourhead keeps vandalising my articles. Can u block him — Preceding unsigned comment added by Danjel101 (talk • contribs) 02:09, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the revert on my talk page. =) -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 04:31, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

I would to ask how does copy pasting from a site which has been encoded from a hand book is invalid? I mean, It is written on a book, being typed on a website, and Im assuming that I could use it too. btw, I'm sorry I'm really new here in WIkipedia. Im just new here, I just read the messages from some admins from my mail few mins.

Thanks Mr Jim — Preceding unsigned comment added by Justinecepriano (talk • contribs) 05:12, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Hello, Jim1138. You have new messages at Murilo Grillo's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

DES ^(talk) 06:00, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Dear Jim,

Both the matters what sreejith has discussed is under Indian court. Generally (Even media) won't discuss anything under jurisdiction.He has no right to offend any body because wiki is open to all.What he speaking is baseless and has been warned very gently. Even when we added our version of story with a reference.He removed it thrice and trying to put only his views which are defaming MATA AMRITANANDAMAYI DEVI.You cannot right with ulterior motive against any Individual. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.243.61.82 (talk) 08:49, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Dear, user Jim1138 you need delete your user, because you have no power. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.121.210.102 (talk) 09:36, 6 August 2012 (UTC)

Can You Go To PBS Kids Sprout Website and Go To Shows/Video And slide Down . — Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.29.246.204 (talk) 00:42, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Hi Jim. There is a user on the

One more note. The user claims that Major League Wrestling is still operational so therefore, if that is the case, then wouldn't he be a pro wrestling promoter? Other than MLW he does not have a history of producing television programs. MLW ran local events in Florida from 2002-2004. --95.211.139.146 (talk) 03:03, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

You may want to take a look at Larsonrick25 in the Court Bauer article. The guy is obsessed with editing every couple of hours and is determined to make sure the world knows that Court Bauer is an executive producer in TV. Very weird stuff. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DigitalApe2000 (talk • contribs) 06:55, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Hi there, I noticed that you removed some links that I posted regarding a Diocese Events Calendar. This is not spam, rather it part of a project to unite Catholic Dioceses around the world to help each other promote events. I linked the Calendar to the Wiki page to help members of the Diocese find the calendar with more ease. Are you able to return this content? Much appreciated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by MaryBroady (talk • contribs) 04:24, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Essentially, Wikipedia is not for promoting your own events. Please see

Wikipedia:Requests_for_help Cheers Jim1138 (talk

) 04:44, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

95.211.139.146 has returned under a different name to continue the vandalism of the Bauer page. Your correction has been changed repeatedly. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Larsonrick25 (talk • contribs) 09:02, 7 August 2012 (UTC)

Hello, Jim1138. You have new messages at Jobin RV's talk page.
Message added 08:09, 8 August 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Jobin^{What's up?} 08:09, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

something about fucking a dog? GiantSnowman 08:45, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

PS I've indeffed the editor for making legal threats. GiantSnowman 08:53, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

And something about talking to him as he talks to his dog. I posted to

wp:ani just as you replied. Noted your indef. Cheers Jim1138 (talk

) 08:56, 8 August 2012 (UTC)

I'm not trying to write over anything. I'm just trying to write to you. Please do not delete any of my work. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Patriotsfan12345 (talk • contribs) 08:49, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

You did overwrite content with this edit. Don't do that. If your edits are unsourced, I, or someone else will likely remove them. Please use proper

wp:talk page etiquette and put new comments on the bottom of the page. Jim1138 (talk

) 08:54, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

I'm going to revert it back - thanks for the sense of humour failure... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Npfiii (talk • contribs) 07:00, 10 August 2012 (UTC)

Vandalism by request is still vandalism. Jim1138 (talk) 07:08, 10 August 2012 (UTC)