User talk:Jitumoni1995

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

A belated welcome!

welcome to Wikipedia, Jitumoni1995. I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions
. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Also, when you post on

sign your name
using four tildes (~~~~); that should automatically produce your username and the date after your post.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

helpme
}} on your talk page and ask your question there.

Again, welcome! KGirlTrucker81 talk what I'm been doing 17:00, 15 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by KhaasBanda (talkcontribs) 06:06, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

September 2016

poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living (or recently deceased) persons, as you did to Pooja Hegde. Thank you. Tabercil (talk) 16:06, 11 September 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

Please do not add defamatory content that violates our

policy on biographies of living people. This is not acceptable. Cullen328 Let's discuss it 03:48, 12 September 2016 (UTC)[reply
]

Michael Ferreira

poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at Michael Ferreira, you may be blocked from editing
without further notice.

Disambiguation link notification for March 15

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject
.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:34, 15 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Qnet, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Georgia (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:04, 9 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Jitumoni1995. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

You currently appear to be engaged in an

QNet; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus
, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. EvergreenFir (talk) 17:56, 18 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

  • Some of your edits may be acceptable. Some of them are clearly unacceptable per Wikipedia policy. It's not practical to tease them out, so I've reverted your edits wholesale.
What I suggest is that you request edits, one at a time, on the article's talk page. Be specific about what you want to change and what source backs up the claims. If other editors agree, we can assist you with changing the article, but you should not change the article until you get that consensus. —C.Fred (talk) 17:09, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
And for reference, this is a prime example of text that should not be written in Wikipedia's voice. —C.Fred (talk) 18:36, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Stop icon
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Drmies (talk) 17:52, 19 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]