User talk:Jkp212

/Archive 1

You have removed 2 people from the Criminals category. One is a convicted killer. The other was jailed on 2 seperate felony convictions. One for statutory rape, another for corruption. I will revert these edits exactly once before filing an RFC on you. You have already been blocked once for censoring well-sourced information. The block was warranted. If you persist in you unsupportable edits, a ban may be warranted. John celona (talk) 19:04, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Celona, your peculiar obsession with outing porn stars, and labeling people criminals has been disruptive. If you haven't seen yet, there are a great many editors who have begun to take notice... A gambling man... --Jkp212 (talk) 19:37, 8 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to John celona's talk page was so beyond unacceptable. That hurts you, not his argument. AniMate 05:44, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Was just a joke. He has called others "Trolls" repeatedly over the last week.. It's pretty funny to me...--Jkp212 (talk) 05:47, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

When you sink to their level... AniMate 05:49, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's actually a nice piece of music...And Celona needs to know that when he throws his fists up with attacks (which is how he edits), it's humorous to others, not painful...--Jkp212 (talk) 05:52, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

How does it get the info for articles that do not exist on wikipedia ?? I do know of such articles and they must come from somewhere. :Albion moonlight (talk) 05:55, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Perhaps those articles were recently deleted on Wikipedia? --Jkp212 (talk) 05:56, 19 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have my eye on it.

Me too. But please be careful. The two categories you've reverted relating to congressional censures are sourced in the biographical entries listed under references. Best, David in DC (talk) 18:16, 23 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hang on}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion, or "db", tag; if no such tag exists, then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hang-on tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Mhiji 21:17, 12 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current