User talk:John4789

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Braun Strowman has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the
  introduction
  .
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Braun Strowman was changed by John4789 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.860274 on 2015-12-10T18:30:55+00:00 .

Thank you.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Seth Rollins. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

• If you would like to experiment, please use the
  block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism
  .
• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
• The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Seth Rollins was changed by John4789 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.880786 on 2015-12-10T19:40:47+00:00 .

Thank you.

Fine, I'm just sick and tired of having to undo edits like that. After all, we usually have to wait until we get an official source saying they've split or come back and start feuding, etc. Plus, another user and I discussed this very matter on the

@

Underride 23:53, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

It's controversial if it adds unverified/unsourced personal details to an

article about a living person. --DAJF (talk) 23:59, 10 December 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

@DAJF: What do you mean unverified or unsourced? You can just search for his height on Google, and it will appear.John4789 (talk) 00:04, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

It was not accompanied by a source, and it is the obligation of the editor adding such information to provide a source, as per

WP:BURDEN. I'm afraid it's not acceptable to say "you can check this on Google". --DAJF (talk) 00:14, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Well I know that. I've been editing since 2007. But you made me curious by saying it was controversial.

Underride 00:34, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for contravening Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

Materialscientist (talk) 02:57, 11 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]