User talk:Johnf1982

Hello Again, the company don't have much sources on-line, but company already exist from 2002 and I see 3 money/finance magazines in UK write about them, and they are a well-know company for UK investors. I only try add a article that don't exist and that I think that is necessary for people know the history of company. If you think that is a promotional, is my bad because don't was my intention make this like a promotion because I don't have any connection with Top Hat Trading. All the content was extracted from good sources like UK Archives, and magazines, the company exist and have license to operate so I don't see any reason for exclude the article. If you have any suggestion's about how i need do it for you don't think that is a promotional article, tell me.

All the text consists of unsourced and highly promotional claims, and isn't worth restoring. I've posted the infobox below to save you doing it again if you wish to write a proper encycopaedia article with references and no spam Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:35, 3 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

1. Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
2. With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button ( or ) located above the edit window.

This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.

Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 23:39, 4 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for message. You can sign your comments automatically using four tildes ~~~~.

• You will not be able to upload images of the magazines. Although images can be added, magazines will be copyright, and copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in
  this policy
  .
• You do not need to add the images, just give full details of the magazines, including the magazine title, article title, date of publication (important!) and anything else such as the author of the article and the page numbers. That is sufficient to enable the source to be checked in an archive if anyone wants to do so

Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:34, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

please sign your comments automatically using four tildes ~~~~. I can't approve your draft until I've seen it, and you haven't given a link Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:55, 5 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Top Hat Trading Limited requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Top Hat Trading Limited is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Top Hat Trading Limited until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 20:56, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Top Hat Trading Limited. Doing so won't stop the discussion from taking place. You are, however, welcome to comment about the proposed deletion on the appropriate page. Thank you. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 23:38, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. - Barek (talk • contribs) - 02:10, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply

deletion process. If you can indicate how it is different from the previously posted material, contest the deletion by clicking on the button that looks like this: which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's discussion directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. If you believe the original discussion was unjustified, please contact the administrator who deleted the page or use deletion review instead of recreating the page. Thank you. - Barek (talk • contribs) - 05:49, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Top Hat Trading Limited recreated again. --- Barek (talk • contribs) - 06:10, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you create another article on that company, you will be blocked from editing. We will also potentially blacklist a title string to make it impossible to create any variation on that name. We appreciate your interest in Wikipedia, but this is not a promotional vehicle. Guy (Help!) 20:25, 5 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I think that not is far you block the variation of company name because my mistake. It was a mistake, not was my intention save the page again and make them live. So I think that you action is too much... Thanks.