User talk:Johntex/Talk08

Greetings Johntex, On

Johntex, Please take another look at Trollwatcher's talk page. His main point, apparently undisputed, is that the website in question had no inappropriate links on it when he posted links to it. There are lots of other interesting points made, which Musical Linguist has seen but signally chosen not to respond to. Ximines 10:30, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Johntex, I plugged your absurdities into Google and it told me I was doing something illegal. You made me break the law! ("Bad Request. Your client has issued a malformed or illegal request.") This seems grounds for not going to this page. At all. · Katefan0 ^(scribble)/poll 11:47, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You are invited to vote at

Hey Johntex. I was the nominator of the AfD above. I made some comments on Cyde's page regarding some of my thoughts about what happened. Personally, I feel that the decision was right, even though I personally would want the article gone, because I don't see how there will ever be consensus to delete this article. However, I was wondering specifically about the process of deletion review. I would nominate an AfD for deletion review if I felt the decision was out-of-process, and not based on how I personally feel ... Is this correct? BlueGoose 00:08, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This may be a wiki, but with facets such as a WikiProjects that regularly go through cycles of inactivity. A coordinator, like that exists at

I am the current coordinator of WikiProject U.S. regions, there is no coordinator for WPP:TX, the position would need to be created. -JCarriker 01:26, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please see this Wikipedia:Deletion review#Rationales_to_impeach_George_W._Bush.

Merecat 00:35, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• Please tell me what you think of this: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rationales to impeach George W. Bush (3rd nomination).
• You can leave your message on this talk page here.

• Thanks, I've already provided me input on the new AfD. Johntex\^talk 07:53, 4 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]