User talk:Jonnyboms

Creating an article about yourself is strongly discouraged. If you create such an article, it might be listed on articles for deletion. Deletion is not certain, but many feel strongly that you should not start articles about yourself. This is because independent creation encourages independent validation of both significance and verifiability. All edits to articles must conform to Wikipedia:No original research, Wikipedia:Neutral point of view, and Wikipedia:Verifiability.

If you are not

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Touchsuite is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Touchsuite until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. | Naypta^talk opened his mouth at 16:07, 2 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SwisterTwister was:

This submission appears to

independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability

of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Wikipedia is not a webhost of business job listing or other things best suited for someone's own website or listing; for articles to be accepted, a substantial amount of actual in-depth third-party news, but not press releases, trivial passing mentions, mere triviality such as funding, partnerships with other people or companies, financing or interviews. Among several things here, it seems it's simply too soon especially considering if the best award there is for "Influential Teens of 2016" (which has actually not been used before for notability).

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Rachel Zietz and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SwisterTwister talk 19:08, 29 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Rachel Zietz. Thanks! SwisterTwister talk 19:27, 31 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to the submission and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jonnyboms (talk) 17:05, 2 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Rachel Zeitz page. If you wouldn't mind...and I hate to bother you. I fully respect and understand your position. Even with The New York Times writing a full feature about her? She appeared on Shark Tank, She is doing multi-millions dollars worth of sales at now, 16...and the fact that her companies products are being carried nationwide in Dick's Sporting Goods? I am confused how this is not a wikipedia entry for a true entrepreneur and American success story? She a virtuoso of business in my humble opinion. Either way, thank you very much for taking so much time to explain your position. This is a learning curve....

Hello, Jonnyboms. It has been over six months since you last edited your

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. 1989 17:53, 22 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]