User talk:Journojack
Hi, the article needs independent verifiable sources that it meets the notability guidelines. That is, you need to list in a reference section reliable sources that show the label is significant (not the company's own site, myspace or similar). It could also do with phrasing in a more encyclopaedic, neutral style, but the main thing is to show that it is a company that matters to other people Jimfbleak.talk.115:43, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
College Music Update
A tag has been placed on
Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait a while for you to add contextual material, please affix the template {{hangon}}
to the page, and put a note on
Additional note: What Jimfbleak mentioned above is the main reason I flagged this article. Also searching on "College Music Update" through Google came up with very few independent references beyond blog mentions and text identical to the text in this article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Pigman 22:03, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
- Hi! I actually think it would be better to create an article with the spelled out title (College Music Update) and create a redirect for the more common name (CMU Daily) pointing to the main article. Unfortunately, I remain slightly skeptical about notability because the first few pages of hits I got were mostly podcast listings and self-promotional stuff. I really recommend reading the verifiable sources, the page is much more likely to withstand any challenges to it. Below is a welcome message with a number of good links to help you learn more about the process on Wikipedia. Again, I'm happy to answer any questions you might have or direct you to someone who knows. Cheers, Pigman 22:15, 13 April 2007 (UTC)]
|
Another editor has added the "{{