User talk:JoyfullySmile

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Fade258 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

• in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
• reliable
• secondary
• independent of the subject
  

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Netflix is not a independent source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Battle Camp and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and
  may be deleted
  .
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Fade258 (talk) 15:42, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, JoyfullySmile! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Fade258 (talk) 15:42, 4 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 15 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved content from Novak Djokovic into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content (here or elsewhere), Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. MCE89 (talk) 03:36, 7 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Alex 21. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. On Wikipedia, it's important that article content be verifiable. If you'd like to resubmit your change with a citation, your edit is archived in the page history. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -- Alex_21 _TALK 21:27, 17 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Criminal Minds season 18. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. -- Alex_21 _TALK 21:15, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Epguides is not a reliable source, it never has been. If you continue to add it, you will be reported further. If you want a list of reliable sources, see

WP:TVRS. -- Alex_21 _TALK 21:17, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply

]

Here are 13 discussions at

WT:TV that discuss the reliablity of epguides. I recommend you read them and actually start your own discussion before potentially being blocked for edit-warring over unreliably sourced content. Thanks. -- Alex_21 _TALK 21:28, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply

]

I see you have deliberately continued and refused to partake in any discussion; diffs of this will provide evidence in further reports. I will take this further, thank you. -- Alex_21 _TALK 23:22, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I am using all reliable sources, thanks to you. It was very helpful to see and know which ones to use. I am sorry you feel that way. Have a good day. JoyfullySmile (talk) 23:27, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a reason you did not respond to the four previous posts to your talk page? -- Alex_21 _TALK 23:35, 24 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by cutting its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Draft:Survivor 49. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by cutting its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Draft:Survivor 50: In the Hands of the Fans. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is

Thanks for letting me know. I was not aware of this feature/option. Will look back and keep this mind. Thank youuu! JoyfullySmile (talk) 16:25, 29 June 2025 (UTC)[reply]