User talk:Jslasher

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Removal of article

Mr. Lasher, I did not remove your article. The Wikipedia admins did, as per the policies in effect on Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. We welcome all interested parties to edit the Wikipedia, but I would like to strongly recommend that, as relatively new users, you and your associates please familiarize yourself with the site's policies and guidelines so as to avoid further disputes. Thank you, Girolamo Savonarola 22:57, 26 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]


Welcome!

Hello, Jslasher, and

welcome
to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome!  CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 23:35, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply
]

Signature

When you edit an article you don't sign them. Just sign your comments on talk pages and things like that. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 23:35, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Another tip on adding things to categories. First find the article, in this case

Panama Limited (Amtrak) does and is a redirect to City of New Orleans (train). Now the Panama Limited and Panama Limited (Amtrak) may be the same or they may be different, I have no idea. So you can click on Panama Limited and either make a redirect or start a new article. A redirect is made by putting in #REDIRECT [[City of New Orleans (train)]]. If you create the article and want to put it in a category, then at the bottom you would add [[Category:Named passenger trains of the United States]] and it will automatically be added to the correct category. Have fun. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 23:56, 6 April 2006 (UTC)[reply
]

{{helpme}

adding user name to Wikipedians in New South Wales.

Can someone show me how to do this. The page which states 'To add yourself ...' is confusing, so I do not know where on my userpage to add the into. Thanks.--Jslasher 01:29, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It's done. As you add more stuff to your user page you should try and keep the category at the bottom. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 06:02, 7 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Editing out articles

Hi, I did a quick check on one of the labels you mentioned and it didn't exist, the best thing that I can suggest is to create just one of those articles... then watch the categories for deletion page, if an article is to be deleted there is usually a keep/delete vote actually on the articles discussion page, it is there that you can argue for or against an article staying. Good luck Nick Boulevard 17:17, 17 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

3-strip overlap

Feel free to correct me here, but isn't the overlap in the actual projected image somewhat imperfect? I think on your site there are tech specs about this. Let me ask, since maybe I'm misunderstanding - "Between Match Lines" and "Perforation Overlap" - what are these definitions of? Anyway, look forward to hearing your response! Thanks, Girolamo Savonarola 09:00, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Just to get the workprints issue out of the way, I'm not too keen to rely on the prints, since they can easily be prone to many environmental and aging factors that can change the measurements if used as a first source. The machinery and technical papers tend to be more reliable, with prints as a secondary source to verify the info.
In either case, here's what I've found. Sorry for the odd formatting, but it's easier than re-wrapping all the lines.
<<Page 25 Paragraph 5 “Kinopanorama specifications”>> 
The specifications for Kinopanorama are different than those for Cinerama and Cinemiracle.  The following 
specifications are estimates based upon careful examination and measurements of Kinopanorama frame samples, 
along with data collected from other sources.  For the sake of clarity, the complete specifications for Kinopanorama 
are as follows, with corrections and clarifications added as needed:  Camera and Negative:  Film(s): 3 x 35mm; 
Lenses: Interchangeable lens sets of 3 x 27mm, 35mm, 50mm, 75mm, and 100mm; Effective overall useable camera 
aperture width perf-to-perf 3 x 35mm: 71.72 mm (2.824"); Distance between matchlines: 23.8 mm (0.912"); 
Overlap from adjacent perfs for each film: 2.2 mm (0.087"); Camera aperture height for each film: 28.0 mm 
(1.102"); Camera aperture width for each film (runs into perfs): 25.5 mm (1.004"); Effective aspect ratio of camera 
exposed area (runs into perfs): 2.57 x 1; Effective aspect ratio of useable camera exposed area: 2.56 x 1; Perfs per 
frame: 6; Camera perf style: Kodak Standard (KS); Linear camera film speed: 140.625 ft. per min.; Useable 
horizontal angular visual field to be used for projected image: 146, 116, 80, 56, or 38 degrees;  Useable vertical 
angular visual field to be used for projected image: 55, 44, 30, 21, or 14 degrees; Individual camera horizontal 
angular visual field to be used for projected image: 50, 40, 27, 19, or 13 degrees.  Release print:  Film(s): 3 x 35mm; 
Projected image height for each film: 27.5 mm (1.083"); Projected image width for each film: 24.8 mm (0.976"); 
Effective overall maximum projectable aperture width: 2.801"; Effective overall maximum projectable aperture 
aspect ratio: 2.59 x 1; Perfs per frame: 6; Projector perf style: Kodak Standard (KS); Projector speed: 25 frames per 
second; Projector linear film speed: 140.625 ft. per min. except for the films photographed in Sovscope which were 
135 ft. per min.; Screen curvature: 146 degrees or 120 degrees or 90 degrees; Sound system: 35mm interlocked 
magnetic; Soundtrack reproducer linear speed: Same as projector; Sound format: Discrete stereophonic; 
Soundtracks: Nine; Recorded soundtrack width (each track): 1.6 mm (0.063"); Soundtrack reproducer head width 
(each track): 1.25 mm (0.050"); Adjacent soundtrack center-to-center spacing: 3.15 mm (0.124"); Outer soundtrack 
center-to-center spacing to adjacent soundtrack: 7.05 mm (0.2775"); Soundtrack assignments to speaker channels 
(normal): 1 - Left, 2 - Left Center, 3 - Center, 4 - Right Center, 5 - Right, 6 - Right wall surround, 7 - Back wall 
surround; 8 - Left wall surround; 9 - Above (ceiling) surround.  Note that the Kinopanorama soundtrack 8 is 
positioned where the Cinerama soundtrack 7 is located so that Cinerama movies may be presented on 
Kinopanorama equipment without special sound patching except for prints that used Cinerama’s special effect 
sound configuration.  Kinopanorama soundtrack 7 was located outside of the perfs adjacent to soundtrack 8, and 
soundtrack 9 was located outside of the perfs adjacent to soundtrack 1.
That's from "Wide Screen Movies" Corrections, which is an essential resource. I've just copied it and placed it here, so give me a minute to read it, too! :) Girolamo Savonarola 09:20, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Why don't you ask Martin Hart if he'd be interested in the workprint stills and the copies of the Kinopanorama info? I'm certain he'd be far more eager and capable of making sense of it fairly quickly considering his immense background with 3-panel processes. Don't get me wrong, I'm interested, but I feel that he'd be a far better resource. Girolamo Savonarola 09:45, 24 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Corrections to Tech Specs on Kinopanorama Website.

Although the corrections suggested by Girolamo were accurate at the time, and, replaced those previously on the www.kinopanorama.biz website, they have since been called into question by Mr Dan Sherlock, from whom some of the original information was extracted by Girolamo.--Jslasher 04:29, 19 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

removal of Birthday committee requested.Jslasher (talk) 02:45, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New Birthday Committee Bulletin Format

Birthday Committee
Bulletin Board

I just have a few announcements.

  • A new sub-discussion page has been formed to discuss the possibility of a change to the membership requirements. I am aware that while I think that they should be raised, others feel that there shouldn't even be any. Please post your opinion on Wikipedia talk:Birthday Committee/Membership Requirements Steveo2 11:03, 13 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Please see the BDC Talk Page for more news, including the possibility of a merger with Esperanza. Steveo2 11:19, 14 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • While Steveo2 is gone, I will take his place as Current Leader. If you have any comments, ideas, or any questions feel free to contact me. Mr. Turcottetalk
  • We added a second First Edit Day Template a few weeks ago. We have also added four Happy Adminship templates in the past few days as well. Be sure to wish users a First Edit Birthday and Adminship anniversary. The users and their dates can be found on the Esperanza Calendar on the Project Page. Enjoy. Thistheman
  • Many thanks to Draicone for adding headers to our Birthday Committee pages. They look wonderful! Thistheman
  • Remember the rules for new birthday templates. You only need my approval if the template is drastically different from the ones already existing. (Just to be clear, I realize I have no right to dictate which templates you can make and keep. However, only the ones I approve will appear on the Wikipedia:Birthday Committee page.) While Steveo2 is gone you have to get my approval. Mr. Turcottetalk
  • If you'd like, you may post on this bulletin board. It's found on
    Template:BDC Bulletin 1. You may use it to suggest new policy changes, or anything else you think is too important to only go on the talk page. Sign all announcements that you add. Mr. Turcottetalk
  • As we reach 140 members wished by committee members, I'd like to point out that we're only limited by the number of people listing their birthday on the Esparanza calendar. So shouldn't we focus on encouraging users to add their important dates, so that our 15 odd members (and any new ones, like me!) have enough work to go round? --Draicone (talk) 14:37, 28 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Last updated by
o2 15:57, 2 September 2006 (UTC)[reply
]

Imre

I've added the "{{

prod}}" template to the article Imre, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but I don't believe it satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and I've explained why in the deletion notice (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). Please either work to improve the article if the topic is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, or, if you disagree with the notice, discuss the issues at Talk:Imre. You may remove the deletion notice, and the article will not be deleted, but note that it may still be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached, or if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria. TheRingess 20:57, 13 December 2006 (UTC)[reply
]

Ramnefjellsfossen

I've looked this over and I think the editor in question made a good faith edit. If like me the only quick reference they had at hand is the WWD then it is understandable why he would make the edit he did. You mention that other sources, like The Top 10 of Everything, give the height as 808m and that it's the third highest. My suggestion here is that you give the other sources, not all of them, one or two is OK and quote them as part of the article. They don't have to be online sources but just reliable. The problem is that sources can differ. As an example of this look at James Bruce Falls which the WWD says is the largest in Canada and then the Atlas of Canada ( a very relilable source) that says Della Falls is Canada's highest. CambridgeBayWeather (Talk) 07:27, 8 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Filmmaking Announcement

A

WikiProject Films is under consideration. All opinions and questions are strongly encouraged! Girolamo Savonarola 01:26, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

WikiProject Films
November 2007 Newsletter

The

November 2007 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot 02:11, 1 December 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

WikiProject Films
December 2007 Newsletter

The

talk) 21:49, 3 January 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

WikiProject Films
January 2008 Newsletter

The

January 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. If you have any suggestions for improvement or desire other topics to be covered, please leave a message on the talk page of one of the editors.Thank you. Nehrams2020 (talk) 01:35, 3 February 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

WikiProject Films
February 2008 Newsletter

The

talk) 18:41, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

WikiProject Films coordinator elections

The

sign up here by March 28! Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 04:36, 15 March 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

WikiProject Films
March 2008 Newsletter

The

talk) 01:24, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

WikiProject Films
April 2008 Newsletter

The

talk) 01:11, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

WikiProject Films
May 2008 Newsletter

The

talk) 20:04, 31 May 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

WikiProject Films
June 2008 Newsletter

The

June 2008 issue of the Films WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Happy editing! --Nehrams2020 (talk) 23:56, 1 July 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Removal of certain articles on this User talk page.

Would one of the administrators kindly remove all text on my User talk page in respect to the Birthday Committee as well as the WikiFilms Project. I do not know how to do this. My talk page is much too cluttered as it as, and it is difficult for me to read this text on account of failing eyesight. JslasherJslasher (talk) 02:50, 29 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Films roll call and coordinator elections

Roll call and Coordinator nominations

It's that time of year again – we're wiping everyone's name off of the active members list and doing a project roll call. Your username is listed on the

task forces
!

It's also time to start the
here by 23:59 (UTC) on September 14!

Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 04:17, 1 September 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

WikiProject Films
August 2008 Newsletter

The

talk) 00:31, 2 September 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

WikiProject Films coordinator elections - voting now open!

Roll call and Coordinator nominations

The September 2008

vote here by September 28!

Girolamo Savonarola (talk) 22:03, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

WP:FILMS Questionnaire

As a member of

talk) 04:07, 10 January 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

An exciting opportunity to get involved!

As a member of the Aviation WikiProject or one of its subprojects, you may be interested in testing your skills in the Aviation Contest! I created this contest, not to pit editor against editor, but to promote article improvement and project participation and camraderie. Hopefully you will agree with its usefulness. Sign up here, read up on the rules here, and discuss the contest here. The first round of the contest may not start until September 1st-unless a large number of editors signup and are ready to compete immediately! Since this contest is just beginning, please give feedback here, or let me know what you think on my talkpage. - Trevor MacInnis contribs 04:46, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Jslasher&oldid=692019328"