User talk:Juraj Budak
Welcome!
Hello, Juraj Budak, and
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizardif you wish)
- Simplified Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
{{help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome! Justice007 (talk) 21:50, 8 September 2012 (UTC)My Greeting
Za pivo i prasetinu uvijek spreman!
Please comment on Talk:Joseph Grimaldi
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the
Cohen
G'day Juraj Budak. Consequent to your comments about the subject book on
- Never mind. I believe you are right. Regards, Peacemaker67 (talk) 06:21, 30 August 2012 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Muhammad Iqbal
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the
Please comment on Talk:Mila Kunis
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the
Please comment on Talk:Ante Pavelić
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the
Please comment on Talk:History of liberalism
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the
- What do you think of my attempts to include Aristotle and the Stoics as forerunners of liberal thought? Thanks. LiamFitzGilbert (talk) 07:55, 24 September 2012 (UTC)
Please comment on Talk:Kumar Parakala
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the
Removal of copyvio link tag from Ustase
Please do not remove the [
Please comment on Talk:Daniyal Mueenuddin
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the
Please comment on Talk:Richard Tylman
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the
Please comment on Talk:David Copperfield (illusionist)
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the
Removal of responses on Ante Pavelic talk page
I note that you have removed all my responses to your concerns listed on the subject talk page. I asked for permission to do so, waited two weeks but received no response then responded on a line by line basis to your concerns. Your removal of all of my comments when I did not change any of your comments at all, and reference to my comments as vandalism is very poor wikibehaviour. I will not bother responding to your comments in future as you appear not to be interested in any opinion or view other than your own. Good day. Peacemaker67 (talk) 00:25, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
- This is your second act of incivilty. Next time I am goring to report such behavior as an incident and request administrative action against you!--Juraj Budak (talk) 00:40, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
- Looking forward to seeing that WP:BOOMERANG. Peacemaker67 (talk) 00:53, 22 October 2012 (UTC)]
- Looking forward to seeing that
Please comment on Talk:Alben W. Barkley
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the
Please comment on Talk:Frank L. VanderSloot
Greetings! You have been randomly selected to receive an invitation to participate in the
Unblock request
Juraj Budak (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
What is going on? A joke?
Decline reason:
I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that
- the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
- the block is no longer necessary because you
- understand what you have been blocked for,
- will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
- will make useful contributions instead.
Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. Daniel Case (talk) 14:53, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
--Juraj Budak (talk) 13:12, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
Juraj Budak (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
First of all, this is my first account I ever used and opened. Then which way I was able to use multiple accounts and where it is visible, and what is the evidence? When I did it and how? Why I should defend myself and how I could defend myself if no evidence of my misconduct was ever provided? I do not see which way I did do any damage to Wikipedia within the existence of my account. I had only good intentions and had a number of serious discussions and contributions, all in line of the valid Wikipedia policy. Reviewing the list of blocked IP addresses assigned to incriminated name, I discovered that the same "name" lived on many places across the US and Canada, then even in Europe! It looks to me that neo-Ustase have their Wikipedia article writers and Wikipedia administrators shielding them regularly. Shame on Wikipedia! --Juraj Budak (talk) 17:11, 4 November 2012 (UTC)
Decline reason:
I was about to contact the blocking admin for their input, until the statement "It looks to me that neo-Ustase have their Wikipedia article writers and Wikipedia administrators shielding them regularly". You really should have read
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.