User talk:Justinallen07

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. ttonyb (talk) 21:02, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue removing Articles for deletion notices or comments from articles and Articles for deletion pages, as you did with Chris Crawford (Management Consultant), you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —KuyaBriBri^Talk 15:01, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see

Deletion policy). Since it does not seem that Chris Crawford (Management Consultant)

meets these criteria, an editor has started a discussion about whether this article should be kept or deleted.

Your opinion on whether this article meets the inclusion criteria is welcome. Please contribute to the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Crawford (Management Consultant). Don't forget to add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of each of your comments to sign them.

Discussions such as these usually last seven days. In the meantime, you are free to edit the content of the article. Please do not remove the "articles for deletion" template (the box at the top). When the discussion has concluded, a neutral third party will consider all comments and decide whether or not to delete the article. JohnCD (talk) 19:16, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Advice: AfD process and Notability

Above is the formal notification of the deletion debate at

WP:AFD#How to discuss an AfD

.

The closing administrator will give less weight to the views of users with few or not other contributions, so there is no point in trying to recruit supporters. Removing the AfD template from the article will not stop the debate taking place, and nor will blanking or vandalising the debate page.

The issue in this case is

Wikipedia:Best practices for editors with conflicts of interest. JohnCD (talk) 19:16, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Block reduced

It has been suggested to me that as you did not get the formal notice of the AfD a 48 hour block was unduly harsh, so I have reduced it to 24 hours. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 20:25, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Brent M. Longnecker

The article Brent M. Longnecker has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Far from meeting

WP:BIO

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

deleted for any of several reasons

.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. SmartSE (talk) 18:02, 5 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Brent M. Longnecker for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Brent M. Longnecker is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brent M. Longnecker until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

McMatter ^(talk)/_(contrib) 20:25, 4 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]