User talk:Kaj Taj Mahal
This is Kaj Taj Mahal's talk page, where you can send messages and comments to Kaj Taj Mahal. | |||
---|---|---|---|
|
Welcome!
Hello, Kaj Taj Mahal, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Getting Started
- Introduction to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
Please remember to
{{help me}}
before the question. Again, welcome! --Lexein (talk) 02:03, 9 November 2013 (UTC)Xchat
Your edit summary at this edit, "no one cares" was pretty rude to whoever you were addressing, and uninformative to other editors. I should know, I'm guilty of doing the same thing too often. Please read
See WP:BLP
Hi, I rolled back your addition at the talk page for List of Scientists Opposing, etc, due to inflammatory language denigrating people. I don't particularly care for those guys' writings myself, but still we have to follow
- Ditto. Your talk page comments, along with your !vote at the AfD, seemed a little like trolling. It would be helpful to keep the sarcasm to a minimum.- MrX 21:12, 3 January 2014 (UTC)
Arbitration enforcement warning: Climate change
Please familiarise yourself with the information page at
As discussed in the arbitration enforcement request concerning you, your edits to
BLP
Friendly suggestion: BLP applies everywhere (not just articles). You'll soon be told this in a much less friendly way. I suggest striking "mental midget" where you've written it. Again, I don't say this to cause you trouble, but to try to help. Nomoskedasticity (talk) 01:50, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
- No problem. But even comments like "inferior" are very likely to bring you trouble. (Not that I'm disagreeing…) Nomoskedasticity (talk) 01:54, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
Arbitration enforcement topic ban: Climate change
The following sanction now applies to you:
You are banned from the entire topic area of climate change, per
WP:TBAN, for six months.
You have been sanctioned for the reason(s) set down in this Arbitration Enforcement request
This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an
You may appeal this sanction using the process described
Note that Editor Review has been retired
Hi, Kaj Taj Mahal: this is a notice that after a MfD and two RfCs, the
Theresa May
She is not currently the Prime Minister. Stating that she is, is inaccurate. By all means edit the article once she becomes Prime Minister but doing so beforehand is inaccurate. As I have reverted two of your edits I suggest if you wish to debate this, then take it to the Talk page of the article. Calvin (talk) 15:09, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
WARNING: Please ensure accuracy when editing pages. She is the Prime Minister, and was officially for 40 seconds before you edited it. Editing in ignorance leads to inaccurate articles, which we don't want here on Wikipedia. Thedamneditor (talk) 16:46, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
Also, the edit you made which had Jeremy Heywood as Acting PM was innacurate. The UK has no such position, as explained in entertaining narrative format here:http://www.alternatehistory.com/forum/threads/ah-vignette-come-back.368378/ 125.237.174.161 (talk) 17:36, 13 July 2016 (UTC)
April 2021
![Stop icon](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/f/f1/Stop_hand_nuvola.svg/30px-Stop_hand_nuvola.svg.png)
Your recent editing history at Derek Chauvin shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.
Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. Sundayclose (talk) 20:32, 21 April 2021 (UTC)
For Kaj Taj Mahal: Three times now, you have pushed to add "convicted murderer" to the lead on that article, as seen here: 1st, 2nd, 3rd. There is a relevant Talk Page discussion going on about that right now at this location: Talk:Derek Chauvin#First sentence. Instead of reverting again (and violating the 3RR rule), join in the discussion there. Regards, AzureCitizen (talk)