User talk:Kathmandu2007

My problem is that Nepal Bhasha is only one of many languages in Nepal - I don't disagree that, say, the Kathmandu or Bhaktapur pages should have the Nepal Bhasha equivalents of their names, but when you're discussing the whole country, rather than simply the Kathmandu valley, I don't believe that Nepal Bhasha, or at least Nepal Bhasha on its own, is appropriate, simply because it is not the language of most of the country. If we have Nepal Bhasha, we should have Maithili, Manang, Gurung, Tamang, Magar, Lepcha, Tibetan, Limbu, any of the Rai languages, and so on. If you think that's a good idea, perhaps we could adopt a solution similar to that of South Africa and the European Union - have a collapsible list containing various languages of Nepal. Tell me what you think.

Actually I completely agree with you that the indigenous languages of Nepal should be celebrated. But we should celebrate all of them equally, rather than giving priority to one.

BovineBeast 12:21, 5 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, i just happened to see your comment and wanted to clarify a few things. Firstly, the map was based using a credible source as mentioned in the image page [1], and as such conforms to wikipedia policy of verifiability. Personally, i am ignorant of the history of Nepal, but a search on historical british india maps, seem to include Nepal as a part of it[2]. And please calm down, when i saw that message, it was almost as if i would be the cause of riots in Nepal. The indian maps i make have a divided kashmir, so far no one seems to have made a fuss ;)
Im a little lazy to go researching history right now, if you can point me to some relevant info, ill be happy to make the change --

update well all 1857 maps have Nepal included as an independent state under the empire. this contradicts your claim that the kingdom was not a part of the empire. as i understand it, it was being protected by the british? --

PlaneMad|YakYak 21:05, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Hi, from

PlaneMad|YakYak 09:35, 4 November 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

So its ok to have nepal listed as an independent state then as i have done now? or you want anything more changed?--

PlaneMad|YakYak 02:56, 5 November 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

sure no problem :) --

PlaneMad|YakYak 10:20, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Thank you for your valuable participation in editing of Nepal. I believe that, together, we can make Nepal a featured article once again.

Regards,

Kushal one 09:56, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Kathmandu2007,

Thank you very much for your swift and detailed response. Your link led me to table 16. Thank you very much for the citation. It is credible and reputable. As I noted in my edit summary, I had been taught in school (by a Newar teacher) that Newars are a language group because not all Newars share the same genealogy. I understand this discussion might be totally impractical and "academic" in nature. However, I would like to know your opinion on it.

For the record, I am satisfied with your reasoning in removing the fact tag. I hope that with more care, we can elevate Nepal back to its Featured article status.

Regards,

Kushal one 19:04, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Kathmandu2007,

Thank you for your reply. I find that you are genuinely concerned about Newars and Newari culture in general.

Let me start by voicing my agreements with you. There needs to be scientific studies on Newars. However, I have some reservations on using the term "ethnic." My reservations against branding Newars an "ethnic group" are based on the bad taste of the word "ethnic". This seems to be totally illogical and based on faulty assumptions. It would be true but you came to my rescue. I am thankful to you for that.

As I read through your comments, I can see that you mentioned that Newars have a highly developed system of "group of people performing various professional work". If I could argue that people in different occupations were in their occupations by heredity, it could mean that the people in different professions would have different genealogies.

I would like to voice my dissatisfaction on your word "restrict". Defining Newars in terms of language group does not "restrict" Newars. Defining Newars as a language group means that we are not limited and we are not a tribe. True, the "dya: chhe:" and "mul ghar"s do predominate the family life. However, these are separate families and trying to say that they split from the same parents is not very satisfying to me. On the other hand, calling

The basis of Newari culture is Nepal Bhasa. Ethnicity or even religion was not a dividing force in the Newars of Kathmandu. We assimilated the Kirats, the Lichhavis, and the Mallas; we had a symbiosis between the Hindus and the Buddhists. I reiterate my position that more study is needed but to settle saying that Newars are an ethnic group is demeaning to our rich heritage.

I guess I am rambling a bit too much. If I offended you or anyone else in this edit, I humbly and sincerely apologize as it never was and still is not my intention.

Thank you very much for reading.

Regards, Kushal 17:48, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please accept my thanks for taking time to comment on my edit.

There are many views regarding what Newar means, which can differ depending on background and understanding of each individual. I understand and appreciate the view that you mentioned, which is one way of defining

Kathmandu2007 (talk) 18:29, 17 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Kathmandu2007

I notice that you reverted my moderation of the language of a paragraph on the royalty, in the Lead section, that in my opinion had a rather strong accusative tone. I understand the feelings of the suffering people, but facts can be conveyed equally effectively in a dignified and moderate way. Please have a second look at it and do as you consider appropriate. Thanks and regards from a well-wisher of the subcontinent. Wiki dr mahmad (talk) 02:04, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I'm in the process of removing all unsourced content from the hippie article and I would hate to have to remove your contribution. Could you please add a source for your new addition? Thanks in advance. Viriditas (talk) 20:29, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your honest reply. I would be happy to help you look for sources if you would help me in turn. Viriditas (talk) 22:34, 25 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, let's move this discussion over to Talk:Hippie. Ok? Viriditas (talk) 00:51, 27 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

1. Arzo Rana Deuba - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL

Thanks!--DASHBot (talk) 08:53, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Currently, the article Nepal is involved in a GA nomination. While I am not the nominator, given the breadth of the article, I am assisting. I request your assistance to as I see that you are a primary contributor to the article. Lets make this article a Good one! QatarStarsLeague (talk) 17:24, 17 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

Hello, Kathmandu2007. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Namaste, Kathmandu2007, and Happy Dashain!

WikiProject Nepal wishes you a wonderful Dashain filled with joy, love, and happiness.

Thanks for all of your contributions to Wikipedia, and have a great Dashain! Cheers.

Message sent by CAPTAIN MEDUSA on behalf of WikiProject Nepal.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:07, 7 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Namaste, Kathmandu2007! You are cordially invited to join the new

WikiProject Nepal 10,000 Challenge

Thank you for your contributions to articles related to Nepal. You are invited to join the new

WikiProject Nepal 10,000 Challenge

, a challenge which aims to see 10,000 article creations. Articles on all related topics are welcome. We need numbers to make this work and do something extraordinary for Nepal on Wikipedia! Sign up on the page if interested and start contributing! If you know someone who might be interested, please invite them by using:

{{subst:WikiProject Nepal/The 10,000 Challenge Invite}} ~~~~ 

Thanks.

---

Go here to remove your name if you wish to opt-out of future mailings.

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 21:37, 14 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Kathmandu2007! You're receiving this notification because you were previously listed at Wikipedia:WikiProject Nepal/Members, but you haven't made any edits to the English Wikipedia in over 1 year.

Because of your inactivity, you have been removed from the list. If you would like to resubscribe, you can do so at any time by visiting Wikipedia:WikiProject Nepal/Members.

Thank you! Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:00, 4 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]