User talk:Keelerface

Welcome!

Hello, Keelerface, and

welcome

to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions

, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome!

Lindsay Lohan

Sorry, but your assertion here is incorrect;

WP:LEAD. RadioKirk (u|t|c) 14:56, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Perhaps you need to dial back the

reliable source... RadioKirk (u|t|c) 15:07, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

University Park is a city in Texas whose Newspaper is known as the UP Gazette a la the Montreal Gazette.So that's how.Keelerface 15:14, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Size? Readership? Readability and verifiability outside University Park, TX? This is the web-link issue; not whether the Gazette has a link, but whether any source outside the city can or has verified the veracity of the report. That's why it fails. RadioKirk (u|t|c) 15:17, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Even worse, I cannot verify the existence of a Gazette in University Park, TX—though there is one in University Park, MD. The closest I can find in Texas are the former Gazette-Courier in McKinney (now owned by Star in Plano, 15 miles away), and the Gazette-Enterprise in Seguin, 250 miles away. Based on the utter lack of

reliable source is established. RadioKirk (u|t|c) 15:59, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

I'd say it's an issue of "undue weight" rather than verifiability. The issue is that a local paper published that a star dated someone local. Well, that may or may not be true, but we don't care. She's single, popular, and not in a monastic order, so presumably she dates people. Unless there is something unusual or very important about this particular date (are they engaged to each other? engaged to someone else? expecting a child together? jumping up and down on

Oprah's couch?), it's not worth a sentence in her article. Last month a different paper no doubt had an article that she dated someone else, and next month a different paper will have a different one. AnonEMouse ^(squeak) 16:12, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Hoax

Do not add any more hoaxes to the encyclopedia. This is your final warning. Hipocrite - «Talk» 16:28, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]