User talk:Keyboardica

I noticed you removed the words "Romantic fantasy" in connection with the Lost Continent (aka Aronsdale) series. You can't just remove anything. It is a relevant and sourced commentary you removed! I eturned it. If you think it is not correct, then you should first bring your proves on the talk page and wait to see if there is consensus. Debresser (talk) 10:00, 4 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

---

Debresser, my apologies! I had meant to enter a note to go with the reference about the controversy among the romance community about whether or not the works can be considered romantic fantasy. I got called away and didn't get back, so it didn't get done. I hope to have time to get to it soon. Keyboardica (talk) 22:51, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:AsaroAndWolcott.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on

Thanks for uploading File:DonaldWolcott.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on

I have tagged the images with the OTRS pending template, so they shouldn't be deleted for now. The permissions queue is typically rather slow- I will take a look for the emails myself now. J Milburn (talk) 11:22, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I found the ticket, the issue is resolved. Thanks for going to the trouble to sort this issue. If I can be of any help, you are welcome to contact me on my talk page. J Milburn (talk) 11:57, 3 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading File:FrankAsaro.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

• Wikipedia:Image use policy
• Wikipedia:Image copyright tags

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 00:07, 20 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article Donald Wolcott has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Donald Wolcott is not a notable public figure.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the