User talk:Kilowattradio
Welcome
Hello, Kilowattradio, and
{{helpme}}
on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Editing tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a
A tag has been placed on
{{hangon}}
on the top of the page (below the existing db tag) and leave a note on the article's talk pageFor guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria
Please sign your talk page posts.
You seem to have re-insterted a non-notable, POV source into this
]Marking edits as minor; O'Reilly article
First, please don't mark edits as minor where you make substantial changes to the content. Minor edits are those that make minor changes to spelling, punctuation, or syntax without changing the underlying content. When you remove or add content, your edit is not minor.
Second, what you say in this edit summary is false. The wording in the source is very similar to the wording in the article. Had you just done ctrl-f for "millions," you'd have found it. Please be more careful. Croctotheface (talk) 23:01, 1 May 2010 (UTC)
Okay. No deception involved. 99% of my edits are minor so I checked it out of habit. A statement by a writer of a web blog article is not a reliable source for information. If you have someone on the record saying they settled for millions or actual court records then that would be a credible source. Kilowattradio (talk) 22:18, 2 May 2010 (UTC)
- That statement is also false. The source is not a "web blog article"; it is a column in the Washington Post. Croctotheface (talk) 21:48, 4 May 2010 (UTC)
- The reference was to a smoking gun artilce not to the washington post article and that is why I removed it. If you have a good reference then put it back in.
- The reference IN THE ARTICLE is this: http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/articles/A7578-2004Oct28.html . I am running out of good faith here. Croctotheface (talk) 04:33, 5 May 2010 (UTC)
- put the reference in the article. The reference for that sentence points to a smoking gun weblog article not to WASHPO article. Kilowattradio (talk) 00:02, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
- For some reason I had # 92 instead of 93. Hmm Ok my bad I hit the SG article instead of the WAPO article. Live & learn Kilowattradio (talk) 00:05, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
- put the reference in the article. The reference for that sentence points to a smoking gun weblog article not to WASHPO article. Kilowattradio (talk) 00:02, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
- Ordinarily I'd just drop this, but I have to ask--did you just think I was lying? I wrote "IN THE ARTICLE" in big capital letters, and your response was "put the reference in the article"? Croctotheface (talk) 06:11, 6 May 2010 (UTC)
- No I was looking at the wrong reference number. It was just a flub on my part. I will be more careful in the future.
May 2010
Please do not add or change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to Andrew Napolitano. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Truthsort (talk) 19:46, 27 May 2010 (UTC)
September 2010
October 2010
- An apology is an admission.
MSNBC
With regards to your recent removals of content, please note that logo use is allowed in accordance with the
Hi there. I noticed you removed a statement in the
File:Nada nadim prouty.jpg missing description details
is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors make better use of the image, and it will be more informative to readers.
If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.
If you have any questions, please seeHappy New Year Kilowattradio!
| |
Hello Kilowattradio: Thanks for all of your contributions to improve the encyclopedia for Wikipedia's readers, and have a happy and enjoyable New Year! Cheers, BusterD (talk) 06:46, 1 January 2014 (UTC)
Send New Year cheer by adding {{
subst:Happy New Year 2014 }} to user talk pages with a friendly message. |
File source problem with File:Nada nadim prouty.jpg
Thank you for uploading File:Nada nadim prouty.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.
If the necessary information is not added within the next seven days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.
Please refer to the