User talk:King of Hearts/Archive/2008/12

Someone, probably you, requested access to the

Confirming King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 22:20, 7 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I don't want to coddle vandals, yet we don't want to tell them they can't reform, either. Perhaps because they had just done a bad edit on Hart, Austria you assumed the following edit was bad also. Google checks out though with a query on "potts camp school" and by clicking through to the home pages. I don't have answers for how to handle this, but I keeping looking for what not to do. Where is the break point for time vs. certainty? Shenme (talk) 02:07, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reverting vandalism is often about a "rule of thumb"; 99% of the cases they go on to do more vandalism a few minutes later. Most of the time I catch myself before I make an unintentional revert, but that one slipped my eye. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 02:16, 12 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I posted a query at WT:U#How confused do I have to be? because I _did_ get confused at seeing mention of User:KingsOfHearts in reference to bad behaviour, and didn't think that was you. Did you know that user existed? Shenme (talk) 04:42, 13 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No, not any more that

User:JimboWales existed. -- King of ♥ ♦ ♣ ♠ 07:21, 14 December 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Merry Christmas. Keep up the your good work on wiki Black Reign 56 (talk) 23:59, 25 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]