User talk:Kingofmann
Final warning
Revert the talk page one more time, and you will be blocked. пﮟოьεԻ 57 13:07, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
Blocked
Note to reviewing admin
The claim that he "was blocked for deleting edits by users including the blocking administrator" refers to the fact that I reverted his blanking of other users' edits, rather than adding any content myself. пﮟოьεԻ 57 14:05, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
- ok, I'll bite - that possible use could that thread have to do with writing an encyclopedia article about David Howe? Talk pages are not chat rooms and off-topic discussion can and should be removed on demand, particularly if it is making an unfounded accusation about a living person. Unless that accusation is (1) substantiated and (2) related to writing an encyclopedia article, it should be removed and you should undo your block. --B (talk) 14:10, 14 January 2008 (UTC)
Removal of comments from Talk:David Howe (claimant to King of Mann)
Please reconsider your actions; this thread was closed as archived by the admin who unblocked you. Moreover, it is true to say that a sockpuppet case is open, which rather disproves that the specific comment from
An Arbitration case involving you has been opened, and is located here. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Kingofmann/Evidence. Please submit your evidence within one week, if possible. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Kingofmann/Workshop.
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, — Coren (talk) 01:16, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
This arbitration case has been dismissed and the final decision is available at the link above. The community can take care of this entire issue itself -- the article has been deleted and User:Kingofmann has departed wikipedia. — Rlevse • Talk • 21:54, 21 January 2008 (UTC)