User talk:Kivel

Hello, Kivel, and

• The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Manual of Style

We hope you enjoy editing here and being a

talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 02:25, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply

On the basis of this edit: [1], I have blocked you indefinitely. -- Samir 20:35, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That being said, assuming this is Shalom, as you have yourself noted, you have done many productive things toward building this encyclopedia. If you wanted to either (1) come back under your old account or (2) come back under a different account and not hit up people who opposed your RfA, I'm sure your work here would continue to be appreciated. Thanks -- Samir 20:47, 25 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Response

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Kivel (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

See below

Decline reason:

Decline. As a blocked user, you are no longer afforded the right to vanish Jac16888^Talk 01:01, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I do not wish to be unblocked, but I would like a friendly admin to delete:

• WP:OLDIP
  because it was blocked, but no edits or blocks in the last year
• User talk:129.98.212.53
• User talk:129.98.212.63
• User talk:71.174.226.117
• User_talk:71.174.224.76 - not technically OLDIP, and not technically my edits, but it's close enough.

Then delete this page (User talk:Kivel) and I'll be gone. Kivel (talk) 00:37, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I won't repost the template but I hope someone is watching. Yes this account is blocked. I have a whole bunch of other accounts which I used before - in some cases more than a year before - and the talk pages of those have been deleted. I would prefer not to list them here but if you don't believe me I can do it. I was granted the right to vanish on those accounts. I'm not asking for anything I was not given before.

Furthermore, even indef-blocked users can be given RTV. See Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/User:Daniel Brandt/open letter for a current example.

Furthermore, the IP talk pages linked above, by and large, can be deleted anyway per

WP:OLDIP even if I didn't ask for it. I'm asking for it. Please don't give me a hard time. Kivel (talk) 02:01, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply

]

User:Kivel needs to be treated as a sockpuppet. The evidence is clear from this diff [[2]]. The first edit by Kivel was made on 25th February 2009, so how can he make claims about vandalism and Sockpuppetry from two years ago. In the last couple of days this user has made many contentious page moves/renamings without seeking to gain consensus. If others agree, then I shall submit a RFCU. Bhtpbank (talk) 07:51, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

We are well aware that this is a sockpuppet, there is no need to 'treat' them differently than we are now, though, since they are indefblocked and people know what is going on. —

neuro^(talk)

I don't deny it. I reiterate my request to have this page and the IP talk pages in the previous section deleted. Then I will go away. If I wanted to hide who I was, trust me it's not hard, but I've gone that route and I'm done with it. Just let me go with a low profile. Kivel (talk) 20:32, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Note also that the pagemoves had consensus, or at least lack of significant opposition, at an RFC months ago Wikipedia talk:Naming conventions (events). The guideline was for rail accidents that had no more specific name. Does anyone really care? I just wanted to create a standard style. Kivel (talk) 20:34, 26 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]