User talk:Klaysaurus

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 13:20, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at 2021 European Tour, you may be blocked from editing.

As discussed previously, do not pre-empt tournament finishes. Per

You are not an oracle. If you continue to update articles with predictions of future results, you may be blocked from editing. _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 12:52, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I updated the information as soon as I got confirmation from where I'm at. What seems to be the problem this time?

You know what the problem is; it has been made plain to you on several occasions. Waiting until the last group reach the final hole is not confirmation, even if one of them has a big lead; you must wait for them to finish. _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 13:03, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Now you are just being beyond unreasonable my guy. I understand the issue before when I was updating info at hole 14 or sth. And I have recognised that mistake. But to put in the information literally 2 mins before the final result when any reasonable golf follower would realise the result is beyond doubt and is final? Either you have decided to target me, or you are nitpicking at nothing. Loosen up a little. Cheers

Wikipedia policies—

a crystal ball)—are not negotiable. If you cannot, or refuse to, abide by them you will be blocked. _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 13:43, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Have it your way. Next time, I will report your actions to the appropriate administrators noticeboard. You have been duly warned. wjemather^{please leave a message...}

Sure thing. You must be super fun at parties.

Edit warring, again

Your recent editing history at Patrick Reed shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 23:25, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.--_wjemather^{please leave a message...} 23:27, 28 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history at 2020–21 PGA Tour shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly. _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 21:46, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. _wjemather^{please leave a message...} 22:04, 4 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for Personal attacks. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

per a complaint at the edit warring noticeboard. EdJohnston (talk) 02:23, 6 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at