User talk:Kunwar Manoj Kumar Raghav

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Welcome

Welcome!

Hello, Kunwar Manoj Kumar Raghav, and

welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions
. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page
, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Shlok 13:46, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

November 2010

chat!) 10:52, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

The singer appears to be the primary topic. Regardless, if this is not the case you need to open a move discussion on the relevant talk page and perform the move correctly, cut/paste moves break the attribution of articles which is extremely important --
chat!) 10:59, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

cut and paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history
, which is needed for attribution and various other purposes. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the

chat!
) 11:02, 2 November 2010 (UTC)
chat!) 11:11, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

AN/I

You need to begin discussing these changes and understand why copy/paste moves are a problem! I have reported you to

chat!) 11:10, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

collaborate with others may be blocked if they continue. In particular the three-revert rule states that making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block. If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the talk page to discuss controversial changes. Work towards wording and content that gains consensus among editors. If unsuccessful then do not edit war even if you believe you are right. Post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If edit warring continues, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Favonian (talk) 11:33, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

The purpose of your edits to these pages is not entirely clear, but it may be that you wish to have them renamed. Copy/pasting the contents of one article onto another is not the way to go about this, as it ruins the edit history, and at any rate, it's better to first discuss the matter at one of the article talk pages. Please do this instead of just repeating your previous attempts. Otherwise you risk being blocked from editing. Favonian (talk) 11:39, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

page protection. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|Your reason here}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Elen of the Roads (talk) 11:48, 2 November 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

The article Jayas has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:GNG. The two spellings are forenames etc but there is nothing to indicate that this is a caste group - can't even redirect to Rajput
due to lack of verification. Unsourced for long enough.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons
.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sitush (talk) 22:58, 18 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]