User talk:Lajoswinkler

Please refrain from making edits on Wikipedia pages such as those you made to Venus, without first discussing your changes on the article's talk page, Your edit(s) require discussion to establish consensus as this is considered a type of change that other editors should be allowed to comment on. Your edits do not appear to have been discussed and have been reverted. Thank you. - FlightTime (open channel) 16:25, 15 September 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Since editing was made to make things clearer and more correct, I didn't see any reason not to do it. We don't need a village council for every small thing here. That's not how Wikipedia grows. Lajoswinkler (talk) 22:11, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Lajoswinkler! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! VQuakr (talk) 17:19, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm happy to discuss my revert of this edit if you would like. Thanks for fighting promotion of pseudoscience in WP! VQuakr (talk) 17:20, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You did a complete revert which speaks a lot. The terms "Brown's gas" and "HHO" are exclusively pseudoscientific. It is not "fringe science". But I'm not fighting over it. It's obvious what team you're on. Lajoswinkler (talk) 22:04, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Oh good lord. Give

WP:AGF a read and familiarize yourself with the article history before throwing around accusations. VQuakr (talk) 23:23, 10 December 2021 (UTC)[reply

]

Here you accuse me of

Yes, you are a hounder. You are following me around and reverting my edits which are informative and scientifically correct. It takes me considerable time to sift through an article and change misinformation or half baked factoids and then you ruin it. Not one article, but several articles. That's what hounders do - they enter someone's page and look for their edits, and then revert them completely, without any regard for what has been changed. I don't care about your passive aggression coated in call center style. You are clearly in the wrong here. You're welcome to "escalate it". Lajoswinkler (talk) 01:56, 27 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Romanowsky stain, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a