User talk:LatinforHoney

This is LatinforHoney's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at
Peter Sorel
(June 1)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by -Zai- was:

This submission is not adequately supported by

Referencing for beginners and Citing sources

.

The comment the reviewer left was:

IMDb and Wikipedia shouldn't be used as sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to

Draft:Peter Sorel

and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.

If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
Draft:Peter Sorel, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7
}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.

If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Zai talk 17:50, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, LatinforHoney! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Zai talk 17:50, 1 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at
Peter Sorel
(July 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Modussiccandi was:

This submission does not appear to be written in

peacock terms

that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The tone of this submission is not encyclopaedic. Examples of this: "two Hungarians refugees who both became highly acclaimed Hollywood cinematographers", "with the gorgeous costuming and set design", "along with other accomplished expatriates", "his most recognized photographs are the iconic images he took " etc. The sourcing needs to be improved, too. Please also remove external links form the body.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to
Draft:Peter Sorel
and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to
Draft:Peter Sorel, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7
}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.

If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Modussiccandi (talk) 08:23, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peter Sorel has been accepted

Peter Sorel, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Missvain (talk) 19:53, 8 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Işıl Eğrikavuk

Hello LatinforHoney,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Işıl Eğrikavuk for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly indicate why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can contest this deletion, but don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Simon Peter Hughes (talk) 13:39, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Peter Sorel (June 1)

Your submission at Peter Sorel (July 28)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Peter Sorel has been accepted

Speedy deletion nomination of Işıl Eğrikavuk

Your submission at
Peter Sorel
(June 1)

Your submission at
Peter Sorel
(July 28)