User talk:Lemabeta

გამარჯობა, შეგიძლია glგადახედო სპერის და დიაოხის გვერდებს?

სპერიში ორ ადგილას წერია რომ ჰაიასა-აზის ტერიტორიაზე მდებარეობდა და წყარო არის მითითებული History of Georgia(იგივე ქართლი ცხოვრებაა ეს წიგნი :დ). მეორე ადგილასაც იგივე წერია და history of Georgia-სთან ერთად 4-5 წყაროა მითითებული და არცერთში არ წერია მსგავსი ინფორმაცია. ჩვეულებრივი სიყალბეა. მე მელიქიშვილის, ინგოროყვას და სხვების წყაროები-ინფორმაციები მქონდა დაწერილი, ასევე სპერის რუკაც და წამიშალა ერთმა. განხილვის გვერდზეც დავწერე და არავინ მიაქცია ყურადღება ან მიპასუხა.

დიაოხშიც ასევე სამი სომხური წყარო დაამატეს რომელიც წლების წინ წაშალეს, ამ სამიდან 1-ში სიტყვა დიაოხი მითითებულ გვერდზე ნახსენებიც არ არის და დანარჩენი 2 წყარო არ იძებნება საერთოდ. მსგავსი სიყალბეები არის კიდევ დამატებული დიაოხში, რომელიც დეტალურად არის ახსნილი განხილვის გვერდზეც.

ორივე გვერდზე(სპერიზე და დიაოხზეც) რევერთი გააკეთა ერთმა და იმავე პიროვნებამ, რომელიც განხილვის გვერდზე დებატებშიც არ შედის და ყოველგვარი მიზეზის გარეშე აკეთებს რევერთს, მოტივი ნაციონალისტურია, რომ შეამოწმებ მის პროფილს მიხვდები. აქაც დიაოხზე ბევრი რაღაცები მქონდა გაკეთებული და წამიშალა. გთხოვ გადახედე ამ გვერდებს, შემდეგ ნახე ბოლო რევერტები და თუ ნახავ რომ ყველაფერი სწორად მაქვს ახსნილი და დამატებული დააბრუნე ისევ ის გვერდი.

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Ilia Topuria, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Cassiopeia talk 22:30, 19 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Can you provide the proof that he has German citizenship? He is ethnic Georgian with Georgian citizenship who gained citizenship of Spain. Lemabeta (talk) 00:22, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Pls see my comment on the article talk page. Cassiopeia talk 00:24, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Go to the article talk page and not my talk page. Cassiopeia talk 00:36, 20 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Khamzat Chimaev. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. TylerBurden (talk) 13:17, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't engage in an edit war, i understood his point and wrote Chechen Republic of Ichkeria(De facto) and Russia(De jure) it can be considered as point made out of consesus rather than "edit war". Lemabeta (talk) 14:16, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@TylerBurden Lemabeta (talk) 14:19, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You reverted twice in less than 24 hours not only restoring your preferred version in regards to birth place, but also seemingly undoing other unrelated editors work through your manual reverts. You then once again added the Republic of Ichkeria even though it was clear the other editor disagreed, that is pretty textbook edit warring instead of discussing. But since you both are now active on the talk page of the article, it's all good. This warning was to prevent you from getting into trouble because edit warring can get your account blocked. TylerBurden (talk) 14:26, 11 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:50, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]

You have recently edited a page related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, a topic designated as

contentious

. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the

Ctopics/aware

}} template.

a455bcd9 (Antoine) (talk) 21:46, 22 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop attacking other editors, as you did on Talk:Adjarians. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Comment on content, not on other contributors or people. This type of edit will result in you being tbaned or blocked. [1]  // Timothy :: talk  08:51, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@TimothyBlue how did i attack any editor? he was inciting hatred by mentioning the false statement that Georgians consider Adjarians, who are ethnic Georgians as second class Turks. Lemabeta (talk) 19:45, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.

Your above response repeating the personal attack on other editors needs community review. You are also engaged in an edit war on the page.  // Timothy :: talk  22:55, 23 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@TimothyBlue No problemo Lemabeta (talk) 12:06, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Canterbury Tail. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Canterbury Tail talk 17:00, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Canterbury Tail the source of it was published on facebook, by the person whose name is associated with most of researches about Georgian genetics. Not as an academic publication. Lemabeta (talk) 18:26, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't quote any sources. Claims need to be sourced, and something so specific as most common haplogroup needs to be scientifically study sourced. A random person on Facebook is not a source. Canterbury Tail talk 18:40, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's not a random person, its a researcher of genetics of Georgians. But it's not an academic paper. If i can cite his facebook post then sure i will source it. But about small people like us Rachians, no one publishes seperate academic papers. Lemabeta (talk) 18:43, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If they're actually a serious researcher, serious enough to meet the standards of a

reliable source, they'll have published somewhere. Canterbury Tail talk 18:55, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help this dispute come to a resolution.

Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you!

Nswix (talk) 14:52, 16 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

According to the rules (Here: DRN Rule D), as the administrator said, it is not correct to answer in the section that you have done. Read the administrator carefully. We both need to be careful, because they may close the thread. I suggest to delete your last reply, If you want.

I answer you here:

- The UFC website as a format only supports one flag. Ilia apparently chose the Georgian flag, but that does not mean that he doesnt officialy represents Spain. The official UFC account also has widely used both flags to represent it.^[1]

- Ilia, in fact, feels very Spanish, and has even gotten angry many times because some (maybe racists) Spanish journalists have treated him as non-Spanish.^[2] He has always said that he represents Spain and Georgia, they are his two nations.

That said, I fully respect that you are from the Caucasus, and I consider Ilia as proud Georgian, but he also represents Spain as a fighter, he considers himself also Spanish (He even has Spanish citizeship), and representative of Spain. Georgia is never excluded with this. DrakeXper (talk) 11:32, 20 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello,

Please be aware that all articles related to politics, ethnic relations, and conflicts involving

@KhndzorUtogh What are you talking about? Lemabeta (talk) 08:42, 21 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Please see previous discussions[2][3] for why a patent bureau is not a notable source. There should be a new talk page consensus for this being noteworthy enough to include first. KhndzorUtogh (talk) 23:26, 23 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@KhndzorUtogh Georgia has a signed a mutual agreement with EU and Switzerland, which will protect the copyright laws of the products patented by Georgia, therefore whether you like it or not, Armenia will never be able to sell Matsoni as Matzoon or Matsoni name in the countries which are included in the agreement. Lemabeta (talk) 15:04, 24 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Matzoon. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Vanezi (talk) 11:54, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Vanezi Astghik I haven't made any reverts, i added new information. Lemabeta (talk) 11:59, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you can't understand that these are reverts [4], [5], [6], [7] (revert and restoration of this), then perhaps there is an

incompetency issue. I kindly suggest you further familiarize yourself with what a revert is. Vanezi (talk) 12:06, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

You have recently edited a page related to

contentious

. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the

Ctopics/aware

}} template.

Vanezi (talk) 12:10, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Greetings, I have opened a sockpuppet investigation Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Əzərbəyəniləri for a user named User talk:Frankish Human with which you have been engaged in an edit dispute on the Matzoon page [8]. I believe the user's behavior is suspicious and should be examined.

If you also have concerns about the user's behavior feel free to make a comment under the investigation in the provided space (or not, up to you)

Cheers,

- Creffel (talk) 15:05, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hey, the user was indeed a sockpuppet, thanks for your input.

- Creffel (talk) 00:09, 9 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Lemabeta! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

• Introductory tutorial
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The Teahouse

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! > Tesseractic: talk? ✎ 20:05, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]