User talk:Leo allen

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Welcome

Hello, Leo allen, and

welcome
to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- Underneath-it-All 19:50, 7 June 2006 (UTC)[reply
]

Please provide a summary when editing

When

editing an article on Wikipedia there is a small field labeled "Edit summary" under the main edit-box. It looks like this:

Edit summary text box

The text written here will appear on the Recent changes page, in the page revision history, on the diff page, and in the watchlists of users who are watching that article. See m:Help:Edit summary

for full information on this feature.

Filling in the edit summary field greatly helps your fellow contributors in understanding what you changed, so please always fill in the edit summary field, especially for big edits or when you are making subtle but important changes, like changing dates or numbers. Thank you.

Providing an edit summary helps prove you aren't a vandal or spammer. Most vandals and spammers skip the summary. Will (Talk - contribs) 05:48, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

1973(song)

A tag has been placed on

criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify
their content.

Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. If you plan to expand the article, you can request that

talk page. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Postcard Cathy 08:57, 16 July 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Lost!

While the song has received radio airplay, you can't speculate that it'll be the band's next single. You need

reliable sources, not speculation, as the basis for creating a new Wiki article. --Madchester (talk) 15:12, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

After reviewing

WP:CRYSTAL to see how we deal with speculative/future topics. Thanks. --Madchester (talk) 15:36, 22 June 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Please do not add content without citing reliable sources. Before making potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. If you are familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add references to the article. Contact me if you need assistance adding references. Thank you.

If the song gains notability (for example as a single), then the article should be re-created. Until then, you additions are based on speculation, and it violates

WP:CRYSTAL --Madchester (talk) 19:18, 1 August 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

Proposed deletion of Lovers in Japan

A

dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page
.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the

proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. JD554 (talk) 07:36, 15 October 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

AfD nomination of Maggie Beare

Maggie Beare, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maggie Beare. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. TTN (talk) 23:08, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

AfD nomination of Arthur Beare

I have nominated Arthur Beare, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Arthur Beare. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. TTN (talk) 23:09, 29 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Eskimo Joe's fourth studio album

A

dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page
.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the

proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Ten Pound Hammer and his otters • (Broken clamshells • Otter chirps • HELP) 20:43, 1 November 2008 (UTC)[reply
]

AfD nomination of Eskimo Joe's fourth studio album

I have nominated Eskimo Joe's fourth studio album, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Eskimo Joe's fourth studio album. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Rwiggum (Talk/Contrib) 01:04, 17 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hold on Me

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Hold on Me, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

no indication of notability

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's

dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page
.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the

proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Boston (talk) 04:38, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply
]


AfD nomination of Has to Be

Has to Be, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Has to Be. Thank you. Paul75 (talk) 01:32, 8 February 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

Inshalla

Can you provide a verifiable reference that

Inshalla. The references provided only confirm a new album will be released in June. Also is questionable whether the first single is "Foreign Land" or in fact "Summarize". Dan arndt (talk) 00:55, 1 March 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

Repost of Can't Stop Feeling

propagandadeeds 14:17, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply
]

Strawberry Swing (song)

Please don't recreate articles when they've turned into redirects. The redirect was done for a reason (you can check the article's history to see why).

Cheers, TFOWRThis flag once was red 12:22, 30 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Turnaround (Kisschasy song)

The article Turnaround (Kisschasy song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails
WP:NSONG

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons
.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{

dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page
.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{

dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Eeekster (talk) 00:58, 16 July 2010 (UTC)[reply
]

Nomination of Findaway for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Findaway is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Findaway until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article.

talk) 09:52, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply
]

Proposed deletion of 1000 Miles (Grinspoon song)

The article 1000 Miles (Grinspoon song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable fails
WP:NSONGS

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons
.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JayJayTalk to me 23:18, 12 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Violent and Lazy

The article Violent and Lazy has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references to suggest notability, fails
WP:NSONGS

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons
.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JayJayTalk to me 20:56, 18 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Violent and Lazy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Violent and Lazy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Violent and Lazy until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. JayJayTalk to me 03:58, 24 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of What You Got (Grinspoon song)

The article What You Got (Grinspoon song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references, no claim of notability, fails
WP:NSONGS
.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons
.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 13:09, 13 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mind Reader (song)

The article Mind Reader (song) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No references, no claim of notability, fails
WP:NSONGS
.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be

deleted for any of several reasons
.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Richhoncho (talk) 19:02, 28 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Rock Show (Grinspoon song) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Rock Show (Grinspoon song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Rock Show (Grinspoon song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lachlan Foley (talk) 20:28, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Secrets (Grinspoon song) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Secrets (Grinspoon song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Secrets (Grinspoon song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lachlan Foley (talk) 20:29, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Violent and Lazy for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Violent and Lazy is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Violent and Lazy (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lachlan Foley (talk) 20:31, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hold on Me (Grinspoon song) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hold on Me (Grinspoon song) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hold on Me (Grinspoon song) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lachlan Foley (talk) 20:34, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Leo_allen&oldid=1139028563"