User talk:Li4kata

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Welcome!

Hello, Li4kata, and

welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions
. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions
, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Categorization of singers

Incidentally, guidance on categorization of musicians (and categorization of categories of musicians) is available at

BencherliteTalk 07:23, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Thank you for your note
Bencherlite, but look is categorization of German, Czech and so on singers by nationality. I think that this categorization of voice like instruments is not popular and not correct. For example, when I open C:Bulgarian musician I decided that Cаtegory:Bulgarian singers haven't. Please kindly look all Singers by nationality and you will see that categorization which you make is not popular. Best regards! --Li4kata 08:50, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]
In which case, those categories could do with being fixed - it doesn't mean that the categorization "is not popular", rather that it hasn't been fully implemented yet. The specific guidance is at
BencherliteTalk 08:53, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]
I don't deny
WP:MUSCAT#Note about singers, see me. But I think that after more categorizations of singers by nationality are "IRREGULAR" is more suitable and this to be such categorization also. So every reader will can easy to orientate. What do you think for this case? Best regards! --Li4kata 09:04, 2 October 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Arbcom case

I've taken the whole set of Macedonia-related edit warring to the

WP:RFAR#Macedonia. Thank you, Fut.Perf. 09:58, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

WP:RFAR#Macedonia, I don't want to be a part of endles discusses which have clear result and also I don't want be banned. Thank you, --Li4kata 10:25, 10 November 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

Hi

I'm writing only to tell you to think twice before calling me a vandal (INkubusse stop to vandalize!!!). Maybe you aren't well informed about the meaning of this word here on Wikipedia; in that case, maybe you should read some guidelines and understand what those words mean. This way, you're only being pathetic and someone might get a wrong impression; you're calling me a vandal, while vandalizing the articles. Regards, iNkubusse? 23:25, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Look now, Li4ka, you need to stop for a sec and get the situation a little better. The only thing that's going to happen if you continue is getting blocked (you can be pretty sure of this). We're trying to make some sort of a compromise here. Read
this and you're more than welcome to comment. I assure you it does not mean that all these people are going to be labeled as ethnic Macedonians - we just don't need to emphasize on their Bulgarianness - if enough info is provided in the article proper, anybody reading it will get it for himself. --Laveol T 23:33, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply
]

An Arbitration case involving you has been opened, and is located here. Please add any evidence you may wish the Arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Macedonia/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Macedonia/Workshop.

On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Picaroon (t) 00:48, 15 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The above arbitration case has closed, and the final decision may be found here. Any uninvolved administrator may, on their own discretion, impose sanctions on any editor working on Balkans-related articles if that editor fails to adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, the expected standards of behavior, or the normal editorial process. Discretionary sanctions imposed under the provisions of this decision may be appealed to the imposing administrator, the administrators' noticeboard, or the Committee. For the Arbitration Committee, Picaroon (t) 02:31, 3 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Languages

Do you actually speak the language/dialect/idiom that they speak and learn in the Republic of Macedonia? Alex 202.10.89.28 (talk) 08:43, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I can't understand what do you have in your mind!? --Li4kata (talk) 09:00, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If you think Macedonian is a dialect of Bulgarian, fine. But do you speak that "dialect"? Alex 202.10.89.28 (talk) 09:23, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
If you don't understand English very well, put your English proficiency on your user page. I can ask in Macedonian if you want. Alex 202.10.89.28 (talk) 09:35, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I understand you perfect in English but if you want to know wheather I understand M. you can write in Macedonian :))--Li4kata (talk) 09:44, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Не сакам да знам ако разбираш Македонски. Сакам да знам ако зборуваш Македонски (литературниот јазик од Велес, Прилеп и Битола). Алекс 202.10.89.28 (talk) 09:49, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Зборам, не како Блаже Конески, но зборам.--Li4kata (talk) 09:51, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Како Бранко Црвенковски ли? Алекс 202.10.89.28 (talk) 10:08, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Како Гоце Делчев. :) --Li4kata (talk) 10:20, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ама Гоце Делчев не може да зборува - више yмре :D. Можи ли да се споредуваш со некој жив? Алекс 202.10.89.28 (talk) 10:30, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ако умре Гоце, езкот кои що зборел е сепак жив. Види се ти на истиот език зборуваш. --Li4kata (talk) 10:45, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Или ти сакаш да кажеш дека Гоце Делчев и Бранко Цървенковски велат на диферентни език. Ако е така се споредувам со двойцата.--Li4kata (talk) 10:48, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Знам дека ти мислиш дека Гоце Делчев е Бугар. Мене не ми е гајле за ништо така - само сакам да знам ако навистина зборуваш Македонски литературен јазик (не само Бyгарски во Македонска азбука). Нема веза ако ти мислиш дека тие две се исти - кажи Да или Не. Алекс 202.10.89.28 (talk) 11:05, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Яз ти кажав за езикот. А за Гоце Делчев нема шо да мислам, ни аз, ни ти, он го е "измислил" веке, сам си кажува за себе дека е Бугарин, ако сакаш да го напсротиш можеш да си повеличш со него.--Li4kata (talk) 11:45, 19 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Gjorche Petrov

Ummm, what the hell was that [1]? I suppose it was some kind of a mistake. --Laveol T 19:12, 25 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Uupss sorry. Macedonian propagandamen are very boring and i'm crazy from them. I really can't understnad why mace- propagandamen have a permission to falsify bulgarian history, but tney haven't permission to falsify greek history. Alexander the Great is still helenic ruler and not rebublicofmacedonian ruler?!!
Plz let's we talk with admins who defend Alexander the Great and let's we ask from him to defend and bulgarians, not greeks only.--Li4kata (talk) 10:37, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ONE sentence

I have one sentece for you: Stop vandalizing! --MacedonianBoy (talk) 12:57, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hmmm, such warnings would be nice if you yourself hadn't done some vandalism these few days. --Laveol T 14:19, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Or let's put it in other words - if you hadn't done the same as Li4kata. --Laveol T 14:46, 15 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Macedonian help needed

Hello Li4kata, I'm contacting you because we need some Macedonian translators to help with the deployment of the new VisualEditor on mk.wikipedia. There are help pages, user guides, and description pages that need translating, as well as the interface itself. The translating work is going on over on MediaWiki: Translation Central. I also need help with a personal message for the Macedonian Wikipedians. If you are able to help in any way, either reply here, or head over to TranslationCentral. Thanks for your time, PEarley (WMF) (talk) 18:18, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:32, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply
]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Li4kata. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections
is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy
describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]