User talk:Lightning Sabre

Hello, Lightning Sabre, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction and Getting started
• Contributing to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia.

Please remember to

Hello, Lightning Sabre. You have new messages at Dai Pritchard's talk page.
Message added 14:35, 18 March 2015 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Please do not upload or place images that you found on the Internet into articles. They are clearly not "own work" and you will be blocked if you misattribute copyrighted images in this manner again. Acroterion (talk) 16:52, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at User talk:Acroterion, you may be blocked from editing. Ian.thomson (talk) 19:59, 24 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have blocked the Kind Dude account as an obvious sockpuppet. I've only blocked this accoutn for 48 hours, but if this account resumes its disruptive behavior after the block expires, it will be blocked indefinitely.

• You can't upload copyrighted images and claim them as your own
• You must obtain consensus for changes
• You can't pretend to be other users
• You need to read and understand material before you change it, i.e. the Mahirin edits where you treated a fighter wing and a fighter group as the same organization.
• You must treat other editors with respect

Please reconsider your approach to editing the encyclopedia. Acroterion (talk) 11:55, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Lightning_Sabre reported by User:Veggies (Result: ). Thank you. Veggies (talk) 07:57, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Do not remove any reports against you. Like you did here at ANEW. Thanks. OccultZone (Talk • Contributions • Log) 08:13, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent disruptive editing. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.   — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:35, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lightning Sabre (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I was blocked because of disruptive editing which I did not know about as I was using wikipedia for the first time.So,give me a last chance and I will improve my behavior with users and work together with them.So,unblock me and give me a chance.

Decline reason:

A

Standard Offer approach could be taken in this case. PhilKnight (talk) 10:35, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You were given a second chance already, when you were given only a 48 hour block and asked - very politely - to discontinue your disruptive editing. But, you decided to not listen, and continued your pattern of disruption. So, what's to lead me to believe that you won't continue that pattern of editing once unblocked. now? — Coffee // have a cup // beans // 09:23, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

To Coffee // have a cup // beans

If i do it again you can block me and i won't appeal for it.I promise I will learn about wikipedia before I edit anything and I won't violate any rules again I promise.Give me a last chance for me to improve.

Regards, Lightning Sabre

I'm sorry but your whole history has been one of disruptive editing. You have ignored all editors requests to stop and introduced a sockpuppet account as well. You have had your chances and not taken them. David J Johnson (talk) 10:36, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lightning Sabre (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am very sorry for being part of disruptive editing.I am telling you with tears that I am very sorry for doing it and I promise that,I will abide by the rules of Wikipedia.I am sorry for not taking other editors warnings because I thought that they were just simply joking.Then,I realised that these editors were long time users of wikipedia and they have experience in using it,but I did not know about it.I am very sorry and I will take this last chance very seriously.Please,I am begging you,if you administrators are compassionate to give a editor a chance to improve,then give me a 1 and a last chance to improve and I will be friendly with other editors.I promise that disruptive editing will end from now on.

Decline reason:

Too many problems in a short period of time. You were given opportunities and warnings to correct your actions and behaviors but failed to do so. only (talk) 14:42, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello, and

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text—which means allowing other people to modify it—then you must include on the external site the statement "I, (name), am the author of this article, (article name), and I release its content under the terms of the GNU Free Documentation License, Version 1.2 and later, and the

While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright concerns very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

You might want to look at

This user has been warned before on March 24 regarding downloading, and taking credit for, copyright images and taken no notice whatsoever. The block should not be lifted under any circumstances. David J Johnson (talk) 14:26, 28 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lightning Sabre (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I am requesting you to give me a last chance.I promise I will improve.David J Johnson I am sorry for the comments.I am foolish and I realise my mistakes.I will be a good editor.I read the Wikipedia rules and I understood everything.Please,forgive me.I am very sorry.Please,lift this block and I will be a good editor.If I violate any rules of Wikimedia and Wikipedia one more time,you can block me and I won't appeal for unblocking again.

Decline reason:

Procedural decline; another unblock request is open below. Kinu ^t/_c 17:25, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

• Considering you've been refused unblocking twice within a 24 hour period, this is getting disruptive. It's doubtful that things will change so quickly. — Crisco 1492 (talk) 09:45, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Lightning Sabre (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Crisco 1492 please unblock me,please.I have learnt my lesson and I am very sorry.I will change my behavior and I won't violate Wikipedia and Wikimedia Rules and Regulations again.I won't do any disruptive editing from now on.Please I am very sorry.Give me 1,final and a last chance and I will abide and follow the rules of Wikipedia.I PROMISE

Decline reason:

Looking at your recent edits and disruption, I do not believe allowing you to edit here would be of benefit to the encyclopedia. I am also revoking your talk page access; if you wish to request an unblock in the future, follow the instructions posted below. Kinu ^t/_c 17:28, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Your ability to edit this talk page has been revoked as an

administrator

has identified your talk page edits as inappropriate and/or disruptive.

(block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the

unblock ticket request system that have been declined leading to the post of this notice.

 Kinu ^t/_c 17:29, 30 March 2015 (UTC)[reply

]

Sit back and relax, take a break from here. Do the other things you enjoy and dont get worked up over the encyclopedia. Murry1975 (talk) 10:19, 29 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Note - To any administrators or Checkusers reading this, please note that this account appears to be the main account of the
  Meatpuppet of IPhonehurricane95, even though the 2 users have not yet been observed actively collaborating. When IPhonehurricane95 returned to vandalize in July 2016 as HeadrushGD, Lightning Sabre (the UnderArmourKid sockfarm vandal) worsened his vandalism and sped up his mass socking. Ever since then, Lightning Sabre's "UnderArmourKid" socks have been extremely disruptive, and the user has continued disrupting articles with 9/11 imagery vandalism and other childish forms of disruption, and the user has continued socking all the way up until now (February 2018). If any future "UnderArmourKid" makes a genuine or legitimate Unblock Request, they should be redirected by the admins to this talk page, because this account was the UnderArmourKid vandal's primary account. In addition, before considering any unblock, admins and Checkusers should consider this user's history of severe vandalism and sockpuppetry, and also ensure that this user has not vandalized or socked in any way (even as an IP) for at least a year, due to the severity and duration of Lightning Sabre's vandalism. And if he is unblocked, he needs to agree to certain conditions before the unblock, and he needs to be monitored closely by admins for at least 2-3 years afterward. LightandDark2000 (talk) 02:28, 17 February 2018 (UTC)[reply
  ]