User talk:Lofstrom31

Welcome

Hello Lofstrom31!

^discuss 00:08, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply

Getting started
Wikipedia tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload and use images
Getting help
Frequently asked questions • Tips Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention
Policies and guidelines
Attribution • Neutral point of view • Notability Conflict of interest • Autobiography Biographies of living persons Footnotes Fair use External links • Spam • Vandalism Sock puppetry What Wikipedia is not • Deletion policy

The community
Resolve disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump IRC channels • Mailing lists
Writing articles
Be bold in editing • Develop an article The "perfect" article • Manual of style Stubs • Categories • Disambiguation Pages needing attention • Peer review
Miscellaneous
Talk pages Clean up: General - Spam - Vandalism Join a WikiProject • Translation User scripts

Daniel lofstrom

I have added a "{{

^discuss 00:13, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Please note that my reason for deletion is that it violates

^discuss 00:14, 10 April 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. AvB ÷ talk 16:30, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Do Not Remove AfD Notices== ==Please do not remove

Please do not remove

^discuss 19:42, 12 April 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

The PROD tag (not an AfD notice by the way) was removed again by the anon (almost certainly editing from the same DSL IP address as Lofstrom31). I've reverted this, mainly because no reason for its repeated removal was provided, which indeed makes it tantamount to vandalism and a reason to block. But we can make this faster and hopefully painless. We have sufficient indications to say that this is either a hoax containing some patent nonsense, or an unsourced autobiography. Patent nonsense and

WP:AUTOBIO#Creating an article about yourself). How about simply userfying this (as the most friendly option) and be done with it? AvB ÷ talk 09:34, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

I'm speedying; the IP editor just vandalized my talk page and I can no longer assume good faith. AvB ÷ talk 11:34, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Daniel lofstrom

A tag has been placed on Daniel lofstrom, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:

Non-notable autobiography. (It looks like a hoax but the author insists it is a real autobiography. If so, its total lack of sources after repeated requests and no notability whatsoever from reliable sources (e.g. nothing in Google or Google Scholar) make it an NN autobio)

Under the

see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page

explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.

For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria

for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. AvB ÷ talk 11:34, 13 April 2007 (UTC)[reply

]