User talk:Logical2u

Archive 1 (Start of my span on Wiki to 2nd Wikibreak, November 14h 2006) Archive 2 (From the last archive to ???? wikibreak)

Thanks for your appreciation. The "ongoing" template you seek does not exist. I suspect that it once existed, and was deleted, I believe as redundant to the {{current}} template.
There's really not much point in pointing out that something is in the news. Every day thousands of articles are in the news, and the best way to indicate that something is recent, is to say so in the text (with a date, not the words "recently") and to reference the recent source in a footnote. The various temporal templates are an example of needless proliferation, in my and a few other people's views.
Though I don't agree entirely with this dated essay, I have many sympathies with it: Why tags are evil
-- Yellowdesk (talk) 02:35, 10 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for uploading Image:FultzHouse.PNG. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on

That's great, thanks. J Milburn (talk) 16:25, 28 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered,

]

Non-free rationale for File:NewtonWake.jpg

Thanks for uploading or contributing to

.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified the non-free rationale on those pages too. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free media lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 23:23, 29 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Le Patron

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard

to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on

Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations

for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by

here. — Rhododendrites ^talk |  19:59, 3 May 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply

]