User talk:Lradrama

Archives

/Archive 1, /Archive 2, /Archive 3, /Archive 4, /Archive 5, /Archive 6, /Archive 7

This admin was brilliant.... 92.40.21.176 (talk) 14:07, 16 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

don't leave! :( *hugs* -- Gurch (talk) 11:44, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Good luck dude, Good luck. -67.204.239.242

That's really bad news, it really is. You're one of the good guys around here you really are. You've done so much for this project and this is a real loss. Remember, people speak up about dissent, they don't often speak up when someones doing a good job - silence is a sign of doing a good job. Don't leave us completely, check in now and again when you have free time but of course real life comes first. Best of luck with college, Ryan Postlethwaite^{See the mess I've created or let's have banter} 12:26, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Well at least you're leaving for the right reasons. Thanks for the kind words. –
  talk) 12:30, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply
  ]

I noticed that you removed your name from the

(talk) 13:07, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Based on what you said on your userpage, I think you did the right thing. I'm happy to be able to say that I worked with you on this project, and I hope that you'll still drop by now and then. Whatever you do in real life, I hope you are successful. Good luck! J.delanoy^gabs_adds 14:28, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry you're leaving. Good luck with what you pursue. Caulde 14:54, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Bad news, you've done so much, but I agree that you've done the right thing. Thanks for your help with the bus route infomation dispute. Good luck! :-) Arriva436^{talk/contribs} 14:59, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I really hope you have a great time in whatever you choose to do. Please don't leave forever - come back in a couple years to see what mess we make without you :) Thanks for the kind words, also. Best of luck for the future, Lradrama. You'll be missed.

Thanks for your kind words. I think your thoughts on your priorities in life are right, but don't forget you have friends here too! Best of luck in your career. Cheers. 4u1e (talk) 07:15, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Nnooooo! You were a great member of WP:F1, and you'll be missed by us guys! Good luck in the future! <sends Cyberhug> =) D.M.N. (talk) 15:25, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Best of luck to your future endeavors. You and your contributions will be missed here. Cheers, bibliomaniac15 20:29, 7 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I hope you will reconsider your decision and return to WP in future.-- Tinu Cherian - 16:45, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't see a reason, and I only hope that it is not because of something bad happening in your life .... whatever the reason, may you be happy and at peace .... and know that the door is always open and the welcome mat is down for a return. LonelyBeacon (talk) 17:16, 9 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's always sad when a user leaves, let alone a well-known admin. I was getting worried not seeing your name around, alas, your decisions are your own. Ceran →(sing→see →scribe) 21:29, 3 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry to see you leave. Good luck and best wishes, ~

U) 20:18, 8 November 2008 (UTC)[reply

]

Lradrama,
I wish you and your family all the best this Christmas and that you also have a Happy and safe new year.
Thankyou for all your contributions to Wikipedia this year and I look forward to seeing many more from you in the future.
Your work around Wikipedia has not gone un-noticed, this notice is testimony to that
Please feel free to drop by my talkpage any time to say Hi, as I will probably say Hi back :)

All the Best.   «l| Ψrometheăn ™|l»  (talk)

Wow, I have been researching this old administrator since I saw the Lradrama name around the place from times gone by. And what I didn't realise was just how many awards he got when he was here! I've found them here!. But he has removed the link from his userpage when he retired I think! But what an amazing administrator this was, and I think his awards and achievements should be remembered, even if Lradrama was so un-arrogant to keep them hidden. I hope he returns someday! 92.40.39.36 (talk) 22:22, 30 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You've had a nice long rest: Come back! (and happy holidays). -- Ssilvers (talk) 22:57, 17 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Following a community discussion in June 2011, consensus was reached to provisionally suspend the administrative privileges of users who have been inactive for one year, meaning administrators who have made neither any edits nor any logged actions in over one year. As a result of this discussion, your administrative privileges have been removed pending your return. If you wish to have these privileges reinstated, please post to the Wikipedia:Bureaucrats' noticeboard and the userright will be restored per the re-sysopping process (i.e., as long as the attending bureaucrats are reasonably satisfied that your account has not been compromised and that your inactivity did not have the effect of evading scrutiny of any actions which might have led to sanctions). This removal of access is procedural only, and not intended to reflect negatively upon you in any way. We wish you the best in future endeavors, and thank you for your past administrative efforts. RL0919 (talk) 21:49, 9 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello. You are receiving this message because of a

(delivered by mabdul 23:34, 3 December 2012 (UTC))[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Pilkingtons Buses is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pilkingtons Buses until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. –Davey2010^Talk 12:57, 18 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]