User talk:Lsisson

Welcome!

Hello, and

• How to edit a page
• Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Manual of Style
• The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
• Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages
• If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also
  Wikipedia:Topical index
  .

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

You have done absolutely fantastic work with the Hirnantian stage article. I hope you are still interested in continuing to other geological time periods. Thank you!--Jyril 21:06, July 9, 2005 (UTC)

Do as you like, I don't know if there are any articles that should to be created first. Maybe those stages when great changes occurred are the most interesting (like the Maastrichtian)? --Jyril 17:10, July 18, 2005 (UTC)

Hallo!

Why don’t you join the Category:Wikipedians interested in history of medicine and help to enrich the Category:Historical medical landmarks by country?

Many thanks!

Luca Borghi 16:59, 21 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your cleanup of links to Apra Harbor! Maralia 04:04, 25 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your invitation. I'm interested in helping you, but I have two issues. The first is that I'm not sure your category is correctly named. In English, a monument is something like a plaque, statue, or something similar. For example, the plaque in front of No. 40 Broad Street, London, is a monument to the Broad Street Cholera epidemic. The items you have in your category list seem to me to be more items and locations of historical medical importance. For example, the Edwin Smith Papyrus is an item stored at a location in New York. It's not a monument.

This is not to say that I dislike what you are doing. On the contrary, I think a category covering items and locations of historic importance by country (and state/provence/etc.) is very important. It will alert people to resources and historic information in their localities, and provide a resource for students conducting research on the medical history of their areas. So, I think you should look into renaming the category.

• A discussion about renaming or deleting (!) the Category: Historical medical landmarks by country(with all its subcategories) is going on. Please share your thoughts on the matter at Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2007 October 24#Category:Historical medical landmarks by country. I agree with the fact that the actual name of the Category is an ambiguous one. But what else name could be better? "Medical landmarks by country"? "Historical medical monuments and memories by country"?... As you can see in the current discussion, there are some different opinions on the subjects.

The second issue is more practical. I can't figure out how to add my name to the list. Your members list doesn't seem to be like a number of other projects I've joined. Can you write some instructions for me on my talk page?

• You just have to edit your UserPage (NOT the User Talk page!) and add Category:Wikipedians interested in history of medicine at the bottom of it. Many thanks for your appreciation. I will be very happy if some scholar or student will find useful this work!

Luca Borghi 08:33, 27 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedian! I just wanted to let you know that WikiProject Green Bay Packers is looking for participants who are interested in improving the quality of the articles on America's favorite small-town team, the Green Bay Packers! If you want to help, you can your name to our list of participants, check out our to-do list, and most importantly, improve the articles!

A new May 2008 issue of the WikiProject History of Science newsletter is hot off the virtual presses. Please feel free to make corrections or add news about any project-related content you've been working on. You're receiving this because you are a participant in the History of Science WikiProject. You may read the newsletter or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Yours in discourse--ragesoss (talk) 23:43, 2 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's here at long last! The January 2009 issue of the WikiProject History of Science newsletter is ready, with exciting news about Darwin Day 2009. Please feel free to make corrections or add news about any project-related content you've been working on. You're receiving this because you are a participant in the History of Science WikiProject. You may read the newsletter or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Yours in discourse --ragesoss (talk) 03:02, 11 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

As a member of WP Arthropods, you might have a view on this discussion. Thanks in advance. Heds (talk) 03:55, 21 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Science lovers wanted!
	Hi! I'm serving as the wikipedian-in-residence at the Sarah (talk) 18:54, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply ]

World Digital Library Wikipedia Partnership - We need you!
	Hi Lsisson! I'm the Wikipedian In Residence at the SarahStierch (talk) 21:22, 29 May 2013 (UTC)[reply ]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

Hello, Lsisson. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]