User talk:Lucky number 49

Welcome!

Hello, and

• The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Manual of Style
• Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages
• If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also
  Wikipedia:Topical index
  .

Yes some of the links appear a bit boring at first, but they are VERY helpful if you ever take the time to read them.

Remember to place any articles you create into a category so we don't get

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

Redwolf24 (Talk) 05:48, 9 August 2005 (UTC) The current date and time is 14 May 2024 T 07:48 UTC.[reply]

P.S. I like messages :-P

Thanks for your note, but it's standard procredure to place vandalism notices on IP talk pages to help admins identify long-term abuse sources. In some extreme cases, IPs like this are blocked and the school's administrators are contacted. The information on that talk page explains the procedures and ways a SUNY student can register to avoid such warnings. Jokestress 21:09, 1 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If you can give out a source like Eddas or anything that state that "Freya is a goddess of sex", I'll say she is a sex goddess. They all state that "Freya is one of the foremost goddess, receiver of half the fallen". It is you people who read or *heard* about her so-called unrestrained sexuality and labeled her "sex goddess". If Freya is to be called "sex goddess", not "love and lust", then Venus and Aphrodite are the same. "Lust" is the way educated people put it.

Snorri's reliability? He thinks Odin and Freya are mere humans, isn't that enough? Freya Worshiper 09:55, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry if I was unclear, I did not mean to say that the eddas stated Freyja as being a goddess of sex, I was attempting to make two seperate but related points. In general, the purpose of wikipedia is to provide information. When it comes to deities and similar figures, that information includes how they are popularly regarded, and also how they differ from the original sources; for example, the wikipedia article on St. Thomas has been edited to make a point of mentioning that the bible does actually not-- although it mentions his stated intention to do so --describe Thomas touching the wounds of Jesus, as is commonly imagined (and portrayed in the art used throughout the article). If a popular source is to be considered unreliable, this should be explained within the article, and backed up with citations. This is not to say that the article was otherwise up to the standards of the encyclopedia prior to your edits; very few articles are, and the process of creating through wikipedia is a constant one. Also, I should do not mean to imply that I myself label Freyja as anything as you have described, but my personal views on the nature of deities and their associations are not a topic for Wikipedia. Lucky number 49 15:59, 10 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Maybe I'm saying this as a joke, but "My interests include gender and

sexuality, animal rights, the martial arts, animation and comics, spirituality and religion, and many other topics." Freya Worshiper 12:32, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Yes? Did you have a point to make, or are you just quoting my user page?Lucky number 49 14:59, 15 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, you are lusty. Freya Worshiper 12:03, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I presume that you are referring to my interest in "sexuality," since that is the only remotely related term there; although I don't see how having that interest makes me "lusty", or what the particular relevance may be to our discussions. Lucky number 49 13:46, 18 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey - no problem. In future, follow

Thanks. I only really started taking action once their insults became blatant, but at this point anything else they do is just another straw. Lucky number 49 14:32, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hey. If this user is ANOTHER sock, they are then breaking the 'using socks to circumvent a block' section of the

policy. If I see the evidence (although a cursory look through the contribs does indeed suggest that the new account is a sock) - ie. show me a couple of diffs - I will block for sockpuppetry (once again) :). Thanks for keeping an eye open ck lostsword•T•C 16:37, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Done and blocked - clearly the same again. Again, thanks for alerting. Have this :), and

Keep a weather eye open! ck lostsword•T•C 17:28, 1 July 2007 (UTC)}}[reply

]

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For excellent attention to the sockpuppetry of User:Freya Worshiper et al, I award you the RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar :). ck lostsword•T•C 17:28, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Re:Grim Adventures of Billy and Mandy episodes

Well when I tagged the episodes I tried at first to see if I could find something online that gave some production details, or critical reception, but didn't find anything that was really helpful (it was a cursory search though, so stuff could be out there). Stuff like that would help, especially if any episodes have won awards that could be cited. Also, do you know if they have DVDs out with commentaries? Commentaries do normally give a lot of information on episode production and are used frequently in Simpsons episode articles many of which are good articles. Ratings could also be used, but I know it's hard to find cable ratings especially for shows on Cartoon Network, but something might be found. Also if any of the episodes had any sort of critical commentary, like an article written about it in a paper or tv guide or something. The pilot episodes might have something like this especially, but it might be hard to find. Anyway this is also a heads up that I'm probably going to be looking through the other episodes later and they might be tagged, but as of now it would still be two weeks before any sort of review takes place on any of them, so there is some time to find stuff. Good luck. Phydend 20:05, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for experimenting with the page

Thanks for the notification, but if you check the edit summary here, that wasn't a test. Try to sign your comments, and please try to avoid reverting articles when it is not necessary. Lucky number 49 03:01, 18 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the barnstar you recently placed on my talk :)

Thanks for the revert. Personally, though, I like to preserve the stuff on my talk page unless it's just clear-cut vandalism just so I can refer back, so I've reverted your revert. Thank you, though. — Rebelguys2 ^talk 22:27, 26 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I saw the vast majority of the series, and that one episode seemed to have the greatest diversity of animation styles of any episode I had seen prior. However, I just changed the "known" to "significant", if that changes matters. --Toussaint 20:32, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind, go ahead and delete the section for now. All that I have at the moment is an [ed2k://|file|Courage.the.Cowardly.Dog.-.S04E13B.-.Perfect.avi|91662406|0A32162BF426EB16FD813356FFA9BC4C|/ ED2K link] to prove anything. I should probably write something up later with screenshots of the various scenes, if that's OK. --Toussaint 06:42, 28 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You left

Thank you for your message on my talk page [2]. I would be disinclined to re-block

I have nominated Northern Crown (roleplaying game), an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Northern Crown (roleplaying game). Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Blowdart | ^talk 13:37, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

Hello, Lucky number 49. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

There is a pending proposal to rename

Hello, Lucky number 49. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]