User talk:Müdigkeit

Welcome!

Hello, Müdigkeit, and

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard
  if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

I normally only salt after three recreations, but I've done so here after two because I've also indefinitely blocked the creator of the second version for a violation of our user name policy. The original creator may or may not be the same person, but there is no overlap at all between their edits, so no grounds for action at present. Thanks Jimfbleak - talk to me? 13:14, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, but the article(that was the talk page) was already created four times, and had been salted.--Müdigkeit (talk) 13:18, 13 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I note that you've made a number of edits since those posts, but you haven't yet entered the discussion at

Hey Müdigkeit, stop harassing people with your crap! Drop it already! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 91.51.95.188 (talk) 22:48, 27 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No consensus on his religion[1] clearly goes back to the status quo before the edit warriors showed up, which was inclusion. See for example [2] -- Kendrick7^talk 19:32, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No.

WP:ONUS applies, User:Kendrick7.--Müdigkeit (talk) 20:02, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Alas, there doesn't appear to be a consensus;

WP:PRESERVE applies. :) -- Kendrick7^talk 20:18, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

@

WP:BLP, that the needed consensus to keep something in the article hasn't been reached- which means removal. --Müdigkeit (talk) 20:27, 5 March 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello how are you. I have a question, Is the new RfC: Religion in infoboxes applied also in infoboxes of nations?. Have a nice day.--Jobas (talk) 00:22, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, however, if you think there are good reasons to exempt nations in some circumstances or treat them differently, you could try to get consensus about that. After all,

Consensus can change, especially if you have new arguments.--Müdigkeit (talk) 07:33, 5 June 2016 (UTC)[reply

]

You naturally don't have to feel obliged, but if there's anything you can do it would be most appreciated. I've spent 40 hours on it this week but it's only a drop in the ocean.--Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 17:47, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Müdigkeit. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Müdigkeit. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]