User talk:MTan355

User talk:MTan355

Hello MTan355, I have a question to your edit on

Does that mean, that the first vehicle was announced in 2006, the second announced in 2007? And what means "and the production LFA supercar in 2009", what is this? Do you mean the production of the LFA-supercar?

I'm sorry for my English and I'm sure this is a stupid question, but I would be very pleased if you could help me. Thanks! --Croesch (talk) 20:39, 5 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for delay in reply, that sentence is as you read it, the "production of the LFA-supercar" in 2009. A concept was shown in 2007, but no production announcement was made at that time. The first production vehicle is dated 2006, second production vehicle is dated 2009. Hope that helps. MTan355 (talk) 01:42, 23 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi The citing for the window concern leads to the http://www-odi.nhtsa.dot.gov bulletin, which I fail to see where it mentions the manufacturer will replace the part both under warranty and after warranty expiration. Is there any other cited source for this, or I am missing something? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.188.127.253 (talk) 04:58, 15 October 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I am just dropping a note to inform you of a discussion currently taking place here (Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Automobiles#Mass article merger). In summary, WikiProject Automobiles is soliciting opinions based on the separation of automobile articles by generation, as opposed to other means such as powertrain or trim level. For example, rather than having an article on the Audi S3, the Audi A3 article would be split into two sub-articles (one for each generation), and the S3 content would be moved to the appropriate location. This would place automobiles with common engineering in the same place, as opposed to grouping by a mere marketing term. Since separate articles are always provided to detail the powertrain (engine and transmission, et cetera), the partitioning of articles based on this principle is superfluous (the powertrain is only briefly discussed in the article about the car). The reason for giving the actual powertrain a separate article is to cut down on overlap: engines and transmissions are almost universally used in more than one model.

This message will be/has been posted on the talk page of all editors who contributed to the previous discussion at Talk:Toyota Camry Hybrid. Regards, OSX (talk • contributions) 23:41, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. In

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Juichi Wakisaka is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Juichi Wakisaka until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Rathfelder (talk) 16:56, 25 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current