User talk:Mabuska/Archive 42012/February
![]() | This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Transmetals DRN thread
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is "Transmetals". Thank you. — Mr. Stradivarius ♫ 23:44, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification
Hi. In your recent article edits, you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Keenaght (townland) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Keenaght
- Killytoney (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added a link pointing to Rath
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:23, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
Transmetal 2
I have removed your references to a wiki. Please use the following sources. [1] or the top three or four here may be of use. Good luck. Darkness Shines (talk) 21:30, 1 February 2012 (UTC)
Geographical coordinates
I've just replied to your question at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Geographical coordinates. -- The Anome (talk) 15:38, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
Thank you
For your support on Talk:La Mon restaurant bombing. I hadn't realised I had strayed from a NPOV.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 12:50, 10 February 2012 (UTC)
- No problems Jeanne. Though the addition of the tone template would of had more weight had a uninvolved editor in regards to Troubles related articles added it. Mabuska (talk) 11:48, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
- I removed some of the text which I judged might have been a wee bit POV (albeit cited to reliable sources), however, rather than just toss up a template, it would have been far better and more constructive to itemise which parts of the article "read like a loyalist's blog". That way they can be corrected right away instead of other editors having to make assumptions. Thanks again.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 13:21, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
- The not like. Regardless of that if Hackney still has an issue then they take it to talk as i suggested when removing the template. Mabuska (talk)14:41, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
- My main source was Suzanne Breen's article from the Sunday Tribune. I don't think anyone could realistically decribe Breen as a loyalist blogger LOL.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 15:13, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
- The
- I removed some of the text which I judged might have been a wee bit POV (albeit cited to reliable sources), however, rather than just toss up a template, it would have been far better and more constructive to itemise which parts of the article "read like a loyalist's blog". That way they can be corrected right away instead of other editors having to make assumptions. Thanks again.--Jeanne Boleyn (talk) 13:21, 13 February 2012 (UTC)
Northern Ireland
I replied to your post of 21:16. I can understand why you would read by arguments the way you do, but you've got the wrong end of the stick. I posted links to diffs and archived dissuasion. I hope they will demonstrate that I am on the up and up. --
Template:Infobox Townlands
In case you were not already aware, please note that there is a discussion at Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 February 13#Template:Infobox Townlands regarding whether {{Infobox Townlands}} (which you created) should be deleted. — Richardguk (talk) 01:29, 20 February 2012 (UTC)
GOCE March copy edit drive
Invitation from the Guild of Copy Editors
The >>> Sign up now <<<
To discontinue receiving GOCE newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list. |
My sloppiness for not checking the facts. I was thinking along the lines of Wikipedia:Vandalism#What_is_not_vandalism, and without knowing the facts it was inappropriate to classify the edit as vandalism. Now protected for 1 month. Deryck C. 22:29, 22 February 2012 (UTC)