User talk:Madelinecj
Your submission at Articles for creation
Articles for Creation
. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Prospect Park Books.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! talk) 15:39, 30 March 2013 (UTC)]
Your submission at Prospect Park Books (October 14)
Articles for Creation
. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Prospect Park Books.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello! Madelinecj,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
|
Your submission at Draft:Prospect Park Books (August 8)
Articles for Creation
has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Prospect Park Booksand click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hi Madelinecj, I think you're slightly misunderstanding Wikipedia's concept of
notability
. Though you have cited many third party sources, almost all of them are about books that have been published by Prospect Park Books, rather than about the company. Unfortunately if one or more of a company's products are 'notable', it doesn't follow that the company is too. Obviously, the Publishers Weekly article is very good and substantial about Prospect Park Books. Is there any more similar coverage? Sionk (talk) 10:21, 28 August 2014 (UTC)