User talk:Maelnuneb

This user may have left Wikipedia. Maelnuneb has not edited Wikipedia since 9 September 2009. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

How do I delete a page that I started? —The preceding

An editor has asked for a deletion review of Arizona Jewelers Association. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article or speedy-deleted it, you might want to participate in the deletion review. 71.223.143.86 00:10, 15 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You voted "keep per nom" at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Whitefield College. Could you clarify your position? Thanks. Arbusto 04:39, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• You were probably removed without notice because you do not meet the #1 requirement for registration, "For security and statistical reasons, all users must request permission to use VandalProof before they may use the application. New users with fewer than 250 mainspace edits and users who have recently been involved in edit wars or have a recent history of vandalism will likely not be accepted." You do not have more than 250 edits.

• Additionally, you cannot use the revert function to re-add yourself to the list. You removed several users that were requesting permission. Mis-use of a wikipedia function is not a good way to request addition to a restriced area. I have removed you from the list and added back everyone you removed. --Mattarata 23:06, 12 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

It is not correct to indicate a Bar, as in the US. In Ireland the phrase called to the bar means to qualify as a barrister, a lawyer doing court work. Durrus 19:27, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please review this newest AfD, your opinion would be appreciated. PT ^(s-s-s-s) 00:42, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

|== Welcome to VandalProof! 1.3== Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Anaraug! You have now been added to the list of authorized users, so if you haven't already, simply

Why did you revert a friendly message to one of my fellow Wikipedians? We have worked together in the past and I was just builiding community. Please be careful in the future. Cheers. youngamerican (ahoy hoy) 16:53, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The page in question was User talk:MJCdetroit. youngamerican (ahoy hoy) 16:54, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I would also appreciate it greatly if you removed the uncalled for warning on my talk page. Cheers. youngamerican (ahoy hoy) 16:58, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks. I've got other worries now. An anon editor is mad that I warned someone on the same IP address as them. Oh well. youngamerican (ahoy hoy) 17:13, 27 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"first-hand" is not a typo. "First hand" and "First-hand" are the more appropriate spellings. This is a compound word. —Centrx→talk • 21:23, 14 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I came to this talk page independently to say exactly the same thing. Check out the entry at dictionary.com. It's also not listed in the list of typos you linked to in your edit summary (noticed that this was because User:Centrx had removed it). Ironfrost 03:14, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Any additional discussion about this topic should be at Wikipedia_talk:AutoWikiBrowser/Typos#Firsthand.

Hello, Maelnuneb, I wanted to let you know that I have edited your monobook file because it was incorrectly appearing in Category:AfD debates (Not yet sorted). This should not cause any problems for you, but if it should for some reason please make sure that you do not reinsert yourself in the category when you fix it. Thanks, Prodego ^talk 17:12, 29 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. Thanks for the note. CRKingston 09:54, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Teddey has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling to someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

--Teddey 21:47, 4 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, you are listed under

WP:OHTWP

.

We have 132 members, many of which are not active within the project. If you are listed there and still received this message please accept the auotmated porcess's apologies. If you are interested in joining us please list you name here. If you're not interested please note this is a one time invite and you will never hear from us again.

If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to leave a message at

our talkpage

or with any member of the project, we'll be happy to answer any of your questions. We look forward to seeing you around!

Delivered by: §hepBot (Disable) 04:10, 25 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! --Rkitko ^(talk) 21:32, 19 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I have decided to put on a mini-contest within the

Hello there! You are invited to attend the Great Buckeye Wiknic in Columbus, Ohio on Sunday, July 10th from 1:00 to 5:00 PM! Join us for a day in the park for food and socializing with others from the Wikimedia movement. We'll be meeting up at Fred Beekman Park, a park on Ohio State University's campus.

If you're interested, please take a look at our events page for more information, including parking info, food options, and available activities. If you plan on attending, please add your name to the attendees list. We look forward to seeing you!

If you have any questions, feel free to leave one on my talk page. Thanks! ~SuperHamster Talk Contribs 05:39, 29 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

(Note: If you would like to stop receiving notifications regarding Wikimedia events around Ohio, you may remove your username from this list.)

Hi Maelnuneb,

In order to better control the quality of new pages, keep out the spam, and welcome the genuine newbies, the current system we introduced in 2011 is being updated and improved. The documentation and tutorials have also been revised and given a facelift. Most importantly a new user group New Page Reviewer has been created.

Under the new rule, you may find that you are temporarily unable to mark new pages as reviewed. However, this is nothing to worry about - most current experienced patrollers are being accorded the the new right without the need to apply, and if you have significant previous experience of patrolling new pages, we strongly encourage you to apply for the new right as soon as possible - we need all the help we can get, and we are now providing a dynamic, supportive environment for your work.

Find out more about this exiting new user right now at New Page Reviewers and be sure to read the new tutorial before applying. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 04:29, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]