User talk:Maiorem

Excuse me, but Soriano was indeed mentioned at least twice in the first citation as "SORIANO, ELISEO, F.". The first was to submit his name for "study and recommendation on [his] certificates of candidacy" since he did vie for the position of Senator, as entry no. 78. He was mentioned a second time under the section: "4. To CANCEL/DENY due course to the certificates of candidacy of the following independent candidates:" Maiorem (talk) 10:37, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I couldn't see it and still see the cites as primary reports and your addition as primary reporting, if it is notable it will have been reported in an independant

Off2riorob (talk) 10:41, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

The cite is taken from the Official Website of the Commission on Elections, Republic of the Philippines.Maiorem (talk) 10:50, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thats right a primary cite.

Off2riorob (talk) 10:51, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

Excuse me, but what do you mean by "primary cite"? Maiorem (talk) 10:53, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

We don't report primary records we report what independent reliable citations have said about it, the article is a

Off2riorob (talk) 10:57, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

The primary source can still be used as it is stated "Primary sources that have been reliably published may be used in Wikipedia" with the caution "Do not make analytic, synthetic, interpretive, explanatory, or evaluative claims about material found in a primary source." (Wikipedia:No_original_research#Primary.2C_secondary_and_tertiary_sources) Maiorem (talk) 11:29, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Over five years ago, nothing happening did it, there was no case, it came to nothing did it?

Nothing came of this did it? Some of his opponents filed and that was it, did anything come of it? If nothing came of it it is not notable.

Off2riorob (talk) 10:58, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply

]

What is notable is that such a charge was filed against him in the first place. Maiorem (talk) 11:21, 6 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Maiorem. You have new messages at Talk:William_Lane_Craig.
Message added 03:03, 30 September 2011 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

causa sui (talk) 03:03, 30 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of edit warring after a review of the reverts you have made on William Lane Craig. Users are expected to collaborate and discuss with others and avoid editing disruptively.

Please be particularly aware, the three-revert rule states that:

1. Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice.

Please read

You have been

page protection. Swarm ^X 18:34, 23 October 2011 (UTC)[reply

]