User talk:Malhonen

Welcome!

Hello, and

• How to edit a page
• Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
• Picture tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Naming conventions
• Manual of Style
• If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also
  Wikipedia:Topical index
  .

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

Euhm... I just know that the symbol ñ in Turkology is generally used as a sign of a velar nasal, unlike the palatal nasal of Spanish orthography. This holds true for all modern Turkic languages utilizing the symbol, too (Crimean and Qazan Tatar, for the least). I'll see if I can find a proper source, but I'm pretty convinced that Ottoman Turkish did not have a palatal nasal phoneme, while it did have a velar nasal. Malhonen 19:25, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair enough. I asked—by the way, I've changed the page in question a bit if you'd like to have a look—because I know that the phoneme expressed in Ottoman Turkish by sağır kef (ﯓ) is often realized as a palatal nasal (not as strong and noticeable a one as in Spanish, but palatal nonetheless) in Turkish nowadays. After a little asking around, I found that it also has velar nasal realizations (along with the most common alveolar nasal realization). I've now changed the page to reflect all three realizations. Any comments? Cheers. —Saposcat 20:00, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Actually, now that you mention it, it sort of makes sense. The plosives have split in velar and palatal series, so why not the nasal, too? I'm just wondering whether any possible palatal realization of ñ should have been phonemic or allophonic in Ottoman. AFAIK, the plosive split was mainly caused by borrowings from Arabic and Persian, and neither of them have /ŋ/ or /ɲ/ for the same effect with the native /ŋ/. I would argue that [ɲ] in Ottoman (not speaking about Modern Turkish) would be no more than an allophone of /ŋ/. Besides, none of the major modern Turkic languages have a phonemic /ɲ/. Many of them do, however, have an /ŋ/ exactly where you'd find Ottoman ك or ﯓ corresponding to Modern Turkish /n/: Ottoman دكز ’sea’, Modern Turkish deniz, Turkmen /deŋið/ (deňiz), Kazakh /teŋiz/ (теңіз), Kirghiz /deŋiz/ (деңиз), Bashkir /diŋɡeð/ (диңгеҙ), Tatar /diŋɡez/ (diñgez) etc. Do you have a source for a phonemic palatal nasal in Ottoman? The velar nasal probably was phonemic at least at the point when the orthography was fixed. Malhonen 17:32, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Oh yes, add the Latin version of

Kazakh to that list. Malhonen 19:27, 5 September 2007 (UTC)[reply

]

Hi, I was wondering what on earth made you arrive to the article on "La Hora Chanante". Greetings. --Mrfoxtalbot (talk) 10:30, 13 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Malhonen, I don't think Mauritania deserves so much space in this page. The responses are very much in line with the three bullet points in the introduction to this section. If we allow this much space to every country with similar precautions the page would become enormous. Robertpedley (talk) 13:38, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You might be right. Feel free to remove any details you feel excessive. Though I must say that Mauritania borders Senegal, and there are lots of people travelling between Mauritania and Guinea, so the country is more exposed to potential transmission than, say, Seychelles or South Africa. I would opt for a small paragraph at least. Malhonen (talk) 13:57, 22 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current

Hello, Malhonen. Voting in the

2016 Arbitration Committee elections

is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Malhonen. Voting in the

2017 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Malhonen. Voting in the

2018 Arbitration Committee elections

is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
• disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
• is an orphaned redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Alexataylor07 (talk) 06:26, 30 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]