User talk:Malqrrishh

Hi There Malqrrishh, I was wondering if you could upload the original photo of this, rather than this downsized version. Higher resolution images are always better. Also is the date correct, you have listed the creation date as yesterday ? Is this the date the photo was taken or the date you last edited it ? Usually the date listed here is the date the photo was taken. All the best - Peripitus (Talk) 11:21, 23 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Malqrrishh. You have new messages at Vianello's talk page.
Message added 18:56, 25 March 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Feel free to delete this notice. - Vianello (Talk) 18:56, 25 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Viraj Dobriyal is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Viraj Dobriyal until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

The English used in RA.One is extremely less than the Hindi used. And it is not even marketed as an English film. Also, a film's original language only should be used in the infobox, not the languages it was dubbed in. Kailash29792 (talk) 07:22, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Why don't you open a consensus on the talk page of each article? Also, I have no idea abt the Taare Zameen Par thing. I saw it in Hindi, and it had less English. "Like Stars on Earth" might have been the English dubbed version, or just the international title. Kailash29792 (talk) 10:17, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please take a few minutes to read

Ravensfire (talk) 21:34, 29 March 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

A tag has been placed on

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. SMS ^Talk 08:50, 3 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please read through the discussion on the Ra.One talk page about the language. Note that the parameter in the infobox is the primary language of the film, not every language used in the film. Multiple sources (bollywoodhungama and bbfc.uk.co) support Hindi only and they are both noted on the talk page.

Please use the Ra.One talk page to discuss the infobox language parameter. There is already an existing discussion here with several points that may be relevant. Thank you.

Use. The. Article. Talk. Page. Yes, I know I'm talking to yet another TJK sock. So it's not like you've been told this before. There's a nice little tab/link on Ra.One page that says Talk. Click on it. Down at the bottom, you'll see a discussion on this. Read it, especially noting the parts about how the Language parameter should be used, that IMDB is not a reliable source and what multiple reliable sources say about the primary language of the film. Then, click on Edit and add your thoughts. Remember to support your view with sources and policy. Hint - IMDB is not a reliable source and

Ravensfire (talk) 16:37, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

And the BBFC source - that's (oddly enough) a reliable source showing that Hindi is the only primary language of the film. Shock! Gasp! Amazement! I've actually got good, reliable sources backing my view? And you're the one pulling out garbage sources? Say it ain't so!

Ravensfire (talk) 16:39, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Malqrrishh reported by User:Kailash29792 (Result: ). Thank you. Kailash29792 (talk) 18:17, 12 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Shazia Afgan

The article

reliable source

that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see

]

Nomination of

Naila Jaffery

for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Naila Jaffery until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

]

Orphaned non-free image File:Viraj Dobriyal.jpg

Thanks for uploading

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:47, 19 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Mumbai125kms3d.jpg

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the

Stefan2 (talk) 21:09, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply

]

Speedy deletion nomination of Life Ise Gale Laga Le

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read

the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard

to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Life Ise Gale Laga Le requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about something invented/coined/discovered by the article's creator or someone they know personally, and it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. SuperHero ● 👊 ● ★ 11:50, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of World Cupp 2011 for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article World Cupp 2011 is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/World Cupp 2011 until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Seraphim System ^(talk) 10:57, 23 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Golmaal pic.jpg

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:37, 18 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Special 26 poster.jpg

Thanks for uploading

claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media

).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:56, 23 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]