User talk:Marie1997move

Welcome!

Hello, EMDRIntl, and

welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions

I notice that one of the first articles you edited was

and objective way, because you are, work for, or represent, the subject of that article. Your recent contributions may have already been undone for this very reason.

To reduce the chances of your contributions being undone, you might like to draft your revised article before submission, and then ask me or any other editor to proofread it. See our help page on userspace drafts for more details. If the page you created has already been deleted from Wikipedia, but you want to save the content from it to use for that draft, don't hesitate to ask anyone from this list and they will copy it to your user page.

One firm rule we do have in connection with conflicts of interest is that accounts used by more than one person will unfortunately

usernames which imply that the account belongs to a company or corporation. If you have a username like this, you should request a change of username

or create a new account. (A name that identifies the user as an individual within a given organization may be OK.)

Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The plain and simple conflict of interest guide

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard
if you wish)

Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 19:46, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

June 2013

Stuartyeates (talk) 19:59, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Please do not sign your edits with my name

this edit is entirely unacceptable. You signed your request with my signature.

Stuartyeates (talk) 20:04, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Looking at it, it actually looks like they've cloned your entire RFPP request from 1 June. :) EMDRIntl, you need to make sure you don't do this in future. (also, please read my response to you on my talkpage) Lukeno94 (tell Luke off here) 20:08, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

This was done in error as we are a new user.

I confess I would find that significantly more believable if it weren't for the existance of a similar

Stuartyeates (talk) 20:23, 26 June 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

You deleted a page that has important information and resources on EMDR, which many across the world use as a form of treatment. All information and citations are correct. There was no need to delete a page that many use as a resource and no reason to accuse us of lying on acting on behalf of Francine. We would appreciate it if you would move your efforts elsewhere.

talk) 20:34, 26 June 2013 (UTC)EMDRIntl[reply

]

Conflict of interest policy

Welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that the username you have chosen, "EMDRIntl", seems to imply that you are editing on behalf of something other than yourself. Please note that you may not edit on behalf of a company, group, institution, product, or website which relates to the entity in question, and Wikipedia does not allow usernames that are

talk) 20:57, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply

]

Conflict of interest

EMDRIntnl, you claim that you are simply trying to provide accurate information about EMDR, but Wikipedia is a community which tries to discuss and come to consensus on controversial issues in order to present a

neutral point of view. This is done on the relevant talk pages Talk:Francine Shapiro and Talk:Eye movement desensitization and reprocessing

. You haven't made any contributions to these pages and therefore have not shown yourself to be willing to be part of the community.

May I ask if you receive any benefits from EMDR, either as a practitioner or a client? In the former case there might be serious problems with you contributing to the article. In the latter, not necessarily but you need to be able to separate your personal experience from what is put in Wikipedia which has a rule of No original research. Do read the article I've just linked, particularly on primary, secondary and tertiary sources, which is not necessarily intuitive but does have a good rationale. In particular, we discourage the use of research articles which can often only be assessed by other practitioners in the same field. Chris55 (talk) 21:09, 27 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]