If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. RayAYang (talk) 07:45, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
{{the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. RayAYang (talk) 07:45, 10 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The article
Per
The word "twenty-three" in the article is used in its plain dictionary meaning, as it is in thousands of other articles. There is nothing to be found in
I hope this answers your questions satisfactorily. --Lambiam 01:49, 12 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]
A new version of
Hello, the permission given on
A
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the
I have replied to your post on
Notice: All of your Userboxes should be placed underWikipedia:Userboxes#Gallery and in the sub-article accordingly. Wikipedia categorization isn't reserved for your own personal use, please stop wasting Wikipedia resources. Thanks. --Ramu50 (talk) 02:39, 24 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi everyone, thanks for contributing to wikipedia! Sometimes it can be stressful to deal with people that do their best to keep this wonderful project working. No probs. Have a nice day. Maurice Carbonaro (talk) 17:00, 27 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Hi -- I don't think it is useful to readers to link words like "philosopher", "scientist", and "universe". Also it's just plain wrong to link "nebulous" to fuzzy logic. I propose to undo these changes, but in the interest of not coming across as hostile, I thought it would be nice to get your reaction first. Regards, Looie496 (talk) 17:21, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Hi Looie496, thanks for contacting me before undoing my revision! You seem to be a very undooing revisionist according to your latest english wikipedia contributions: 4 reverted edits on 7 in the last two days. But please don't get me wrong! I am a wikipedia administrator myself and I know there is loz of vandalism "out there". So I also appreciate that you started a discussion with me telling what were your thoughts about my last three revisionson the consciousness wikipedia article. This even if they are all negative (if not plain negative!). Thanks for proposing me to undo these changes: you are the very FIRST polite editor that I have encountered on wikipedia in the last SIX years writing me so nicely about undoing my changes. Please give me 24 hours for thinking about it. Please also consider writing something more about yourself in the meantime! Noone is biting you... Thanks for reading me. (Good night? Duh? I don't even know time zone is!) Maurice Carbonaro (talk) 21:10, 20 March 2009 (UTC)[reply] P.S.: I am posting these two messages on the consciousness discussion page too in order to try involve other editors in the next 24 hours.
Hello, Maurice Carbonaro/Archives. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Could_use_a_pair_of_eyes. Thank you. Toddst1 (talk) 03:10, 21 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
I am currently a graduate student, working on a semester project regarding Wikipedia. I was hoping you would be able to privately answer a few questions in reference to your personal experience with Wikipedia in order for me to get your view on the website. The questions are on my user page, and if you could answer in them in word and e-mail them to the address shown that would be really helpful. Your anonymity is assured, and any personal information you give will never be used outside of this questionnaire. Thank you for your time.Curesearcher (talk) 02:54, 29 March 2009 (UTC) [reply]
[email protected].
In the meantime, please have a nice and relaxed sunday. Thanks for your attention. Maurice Carbonaro (talk) 10:42, 29 March 2009 (UTC) [reply]
== "Unreferenced bio" on Petra Reski == Hi there, LaraBot, a bot operated by you, has contacted me on my discussion page leaving me this following message:
Yesterday, 11 september 2009, in the revision history for the creation of the Petra Reski english wikipedia article I have motivated the creation of a new article writing:
If you think that internal translations from different wikipedia languages can't be considered "reliable enough" please feel free to cancel the partial translation I have created. Thank you for your attention.
Maurice Carbonaro (talk) 07:24, 12 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]