User talk:Melekali

Hello, Melekali, and Welcome to Wikipedia! Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field . Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! Uncia (talk) 16:22, 22 August 2009 (UTC)[reply] Getting started Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia Finding your way around Table of contents Department directory Editing articles How to develop an article Manual of Style Getting help Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page How you can help Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

Hello & welcome. I noticed that you added info about the VP8. It would be helpful if you could contribute a brief description of it to: VP8 Image Analyzer. I started teh page, all you need to do is add the knowledge that I think you probably have. Thanks. History2007 (talk) 08:00, 3 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for the VP8 additions. Is it still working, or should the description use the past tense? Did it result in a VP9 or something? And what did VP stand for? Was there a VP7 Or is 8 the number 2 to the power of 3? If a photo of it can be added, it will be very nice for it will give the reader an idea of what the machine looks like, and will make it "real" in their mind. Thanks. History2007 (talk) 03:05, 25 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I edited the VP8 page before anyone else could get to it. I you add external sites to the body of an article and make blanket statements, the page will get flagged as biased and spam and may eventually even get deleted. So please step forward, but carefully. Wikipedia ha smany policies and many people watch these pages. Thanks. History2007 (talk) 18:47, 31 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not wipe out over a year's worth of updates. And please read over

Sorry, that wasn't my intention. One user wiped out my valuable observation no fan of McCrone wants known. He wasn't in Turin for the study of the actual Shroud in 1978, but only studied evidence brought back and his conclusions were based on his conclusions from his review of the evidence done only with his naked eye, not with microscopy. His conclusions are therefore invalid. I re-added my comment in that place rather than undoing since it undid more than this one undo. Thanks for your message and concern for the completeness of the work. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Melekali (talk • contribs) 03:45, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It will probably be removed again if you don't add a cite to a

reliable source. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 03:49, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

When it was removed there was no explanation. It's a fact of history. What kind of reference are you expecting? Melekali (talk) 03:51, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

To an academic work, paper, or book that will

verify the content you added. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 03:56, 14 March 2017 (UTC)[reply

]

Thanks. I have restored my comment again and provided an authoritative source on the makeup of the STURP team. Melekali (talk) 00:29, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]