User talk:Mettimeline

Page contents not supported in other languages.
Source: Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Please do not add commercial links or links to your own private websites to Wikipedia.

welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Thank you. --Nlu (talk) 18:51, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply
]

Please stop adding commercial or personal-website links to Wikipedia. It is considered

Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising. Thanks. --Nlu (talk) 18:51, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply
]

Although perhaps not the worst example of
External Links. Please don't add any more of these links - they will just be reverted. -- Solipsist 20:27, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply
]

Dear Nlu: Thank you for your email. We are not a commercial site. We are the Metropolitan Museum of Art in New York City, and the Timeline of Art History is our online resource visited by more than 20,000 per day, most of whom are students, teachers, professors, scholars, and art historians. If you were to review our contributions, you would see that these are links to directly related content on our site and this is done in an effort to broaden the audience to our educational resource. Please reconsider our contributions. We are interested in adding web links and not editing the existing textual content. Please advise on the proper methods.

Sincerely, Teresa Lai, Editor-in-Chief, Timeline of Art History mettimeline 17:32, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

In my opinion, the links were not compliant with
WP:EL; however, if you disagree with me, you are certainly free to discuss whether your links should be allowed to stand by going to the talk page of the article in question. (As an example, if the link were to be added to, say, Donald Duck, the talk page would be Talk:Donald Duck.) But your edits had another major problem; it was adding the wrong link to the articles, as the script that you were using to add the links apparently was one article off -- the link referred to the article that you had edited right before. That needs to be fixed, at least. But I still disagree with your addition of the links. --Nlu (talk) 21:42, 19 September 2006 (UTC)[reply
]