User talk:MewTheEditor

An article you recently created,

I've added an appropriate source. Shouldn't the page on the single-cycle variant also cite more than zero sources? --MewTheEditor (talk) 08:54, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. You're right, Single cycle processor does need a source. That article was first created in 2008, which was before the New Page Review was set up, which is why the lack of sources was picked up on Multi-cycle processor but not on Single cycle processor. As you obviously have knowledge of the subject, if you could add a source there that would be great. Regards. --John B123 (talk) 09:40, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Lucky for us, it's the exact same source, just the section before multi-cycle processors. --MewTheEditor (talk) 20:52, 6 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Multi-cycle processor, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Gpkp [u • t • c] 10:53, 20 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called

page-specific restrictions

, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the

guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here

. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Doug Weller talk 10:21, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]