User talk:MikeR613

Welcome!

Hello, MikeR613, and

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• Article Wizard
  if you wish)
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a

Sorry your edit for caught up in another revert and I neglected to restore it. Apologies. Pipsally (talk) 13:26, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

np! Thanks for responding. MikeR613 (talk) 16:57, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Appreciate you editing Maimonides, keep up the good work!155.246.151.38 (talk) 17:17, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! You too. MikeR613 (talk) 17:57, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Mike, it appears that there is anti-semitism on wikipedia. If you know any media outlets or reporters can you please bring their attention to this RSN? Some of these responses [1] [2] are not okay. If the only way to deal with this is through media attention, then so be it. Thanks Mike!155.246.151.38 (talk) 21:23, 9 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hey Mike, good to see that you are actively interested in Maimonides and 13 principles and Hilchos Teshuva! Keep up your interest and learning!

In regards to your specific point, look over Hilchos teshuva where the Rambam does not hesitate to make lists. For example, lists of heretics. Since the Rambam did not explicitly list out the 13 principles, some have speculated on the reason for that. Not saying that they are correct, but there is some speculation.155.246.151.38 (talk) 21:05, 10 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have no problem with speculation, "Why does the Rambam give something a special name here and not here." I don't say that the question bothers me, but that's me; that's fine that someone talks about it. However, the speculation should not include things that are obviously ruled out by the facts, like, Did the Rambam change his mind on whether these things are forbidden or carry severe punishment? What exactly is he supposed to have "retracted", his choice of wording in two different books?

I do think, though, that the new wording is much better than the old, leaving out some gratuitous (incorrect) statement about the Orthodox. I'm not as fussed about it as I was.MikeR613 (talk) 01:39, 11 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent editing history shows that you are currently engaged in an edit war; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. To resolve the content dispute, please do not revert or change the edits of others when you are reverted. Instead of reverting, please use the talk page to work toward making a version that represents consensus among editors. The best practice at this stage is to discuss, not edit-war. See the bold, revert, discuss cycle for how this is done. If discussions reach an impasse, you can then post a request for help at a relevant noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, you may wish to request temporary page protection.

Being involved in an edit war can result in you being blocked from editing—especially if you violate the three-revert rule, which states that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Undoing another editor's work—whether in whole or in part, whether involving the same or different material each time—counts as a revert. Also keep in mind that while violating the three-revert rule often leads to a block, you can still be blocked for edit warring—even if you do not violate the three-revert rule—should your behavior indicate that you intend to continue reverting repeatedly.

Specifically, [3] is your fourth revert so you risk being blocked William M. Connolley (talk) 19:45, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As do you. Except that you guys are doing it as a team. And, anyone who adjudicates will see who is being unreasonable. MikeR613 (talk) 21:10, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in

page-specific restrictions

, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the

guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here

. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Update for information, as mentioned at Talk:Steve McIntyre#IPCC Expert Reviewer. . . dave souza, talk 22:12, 5 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Voting in the

2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply

]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called

page-specific restrictions

, when making edits related to the topic.

To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{

guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here

. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

Hello! Voting in the

2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users

are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The

topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy

describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review

NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply

]