User talk:Monhiroe

		The Editor's Barnstar
		For being a leading editor in new Tamil films. DareshMohan (talk) 07:59, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Monhiroe (talk) 08:14, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 12:05, 15 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1. Write out numbered ratings in words such as two-and-a-half instead of 2.5. See Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Dates_and_numbers#Numbers_as_figures_or_words.
2. Don't include Marketing information such as poster and trailer release date. See Wikipedia:Manual of Style/Film#Secondary_content#Marketing. DareshMohan (talk) 19:12, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

   sure bro Monhiroe (talk) 19:14, 16 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

   Don't create biography for editors that haven't work on many (10+ films). More importantly, without sources. Draft:Ravikumar M doesn't look significant. DareshMohan (talk) 07:31, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

   bro no bro. i thought first he is notable after watching Thalaimai Seyalagam. Then after checking his IMDB very limited film he had .Then i did not do draft .i left it Monhiroe (talk) 07:48, 20 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I know that but please do not create such drafts in the first place. User:KickNClick who expanded the draft must be Ravikumar M. You can also delete drafts with db-author tag. DareshMohan (talk) 06:44, 22 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kanni (2024), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mystery.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 24 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hridhu Haroon, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its

grading scheme

to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Xegma(talk) 08:00, 2 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Monhiroe, I just wanted to let you know that I have added the autopatrolled user right to your account. This means that pages you create will automatically be marked as 'reviewed', and no longer appear in the new pages feed. Autopatrolled is assigned to prolific creators of articles, where those articles do not require further review, and may have been requested on your behalf by someone else. It doesn't affect how you edit; it is used only to manage the workload of new page patrollers.

Since the articles you create will no longer be systematically reviewed by other editors, it is important that you maintain the high standard you have achieved so far in all your future creations. Please also try to remember to add relevant WikiProject templates, stub tags, categories, and incoming links to them, if you aren't already in the habit; user scripts such as Rater and StubSorter can help with this. As you have already shown that you have a strong grasp of Wikipedia's core content policies, you might also consider volunteering to become a new page patroller yourself, helping to uphold the project's standards and encourage other good faith article writers.

Feel free to leave me a message if you have any questions. Happy editing! Just Step Sideways ^{from this world ..... today} 22:04, 6 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

revoked

It has been brought to my attention that several of your recent creations have needed significant cleanup after being moved to article space, which means you probably shouldn't be autopatrolled. This will have no effect on yourt ability to create new pages, it just seems clear that your articles benefit from being reviewed by others. Just Step Sideways ^{from this world ..... today} 19:50, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also applies with partially reshot films. Merged

no cast and crew and directors are different Monhiroe (talk) 05:43, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It was a marketing scam. The director should have actually reshot more of the film instead he reused

Maalaimalar review talks about Suman Ranganathan's role. Dina Thanthi source reused a still from the original film and also mentioned Richa Shasthri. DareshMohan (talk) 08:17, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

Pithala Maathi is the same as Thanne Vandi. Please read [1]. DareshMohan (talk) 01:35, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply

]

bto!! what hell this producers doing?? same movie name different!!! Monhiroe (talk) 09:29, 19 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The article you submitted to Articles for creation has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now

create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation

if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to

create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation

.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DareshMohan (talk) 04:27, 13 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

it isnt standard/looks odd. DareshMohan (talk) 06:08, 26 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

kalki blockbuster cinema. DareshMohan (talk) 06:36, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia.

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:

This submission is not adequately supported by

reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources

.

 The comment the reviewer left was:

Please do not use the Times of India for entertainment sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bhavya Trikha and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Qcne (talk) 11:54, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Monhiroe! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Qcne (talk) 11:54, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]