User talk:Mootros/Archives/2009/August
This page is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
New message
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.
Talk:List of online backup services
Will you be starting an
12:51, 25 August 2009 (UTC)- Go for it. If you don't mind. Thanks! Mootros (talk) 13:02, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
- The second RFC that you created is a bit puzzling. That topic hasn't really been covered on the talk page and RFC generally is resorted to only when an impasse exists on topics that have been discussed. The previous discussion was about notability requirements, not classification of the article. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 14:03, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
- I see. Sorry about the confusion. Perhaps I was not very explicit on this point. See:
- The second RFC that you created is a bit puzzling. That topic hasn't really been covered on the talk page and RFC generally is resorted to only when an impasse exists on topics that have been discussed. The previous discussion was about notability requirements, not classification of the article. -- Mufka (u) (t) (c) 14:03, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
“ | Yes, that appears be exactly the issue here. A banner on the top does not make it automatically true and therefore notable! | ” |
- I think, the entire problem stems from a mis-interpretation of the terms "stand alone list". I was trying to summaries this in the end in a ) 23:03, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
test
Mootros (talk) 13:30, 25 August 2009 (UTC)
Capitalization
Please be aware that per
Proposed deletion of Life imprisonment (Uruguay)
The article Life imprisonment (Uruguay) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Propose delete and merge of this article into Death Penalty
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{
Proposed deletion of Life imprisonment (Norway)
The article
- This article is at best misleading. It is referenced to a law that is still not in effect. Also it gets forvaring wrong. I.e. "forvaring" does not mean 21 years imprisonment like the article says. There are also longer imprisonment rules for war crimes etc.
While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{
- Thanks for your message Rettetast. Yes go for it, if you think it's beyond rescue. This article came from the following page, which I had completely restructured: Life_imprisonment Do you mind to just have a quick look through and check the Norway entry. Thanks! Mootros (talk) 13:25, 31 August 2009 (UTC)