User talk:Moponoly

Hi Moponoly! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like AmaryllisGardener (talk). Visit the Teahouse We hope to see you there! Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:08, 21 August 2018 (UTC)

Hello, Moponoly, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Shrike (talk) 07:01, 28 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Shrike: Thanks! Moponoly (talk) 18:03, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Moponoly, i just removed my warning on your talk page since you explained your edit at Jews, my appologies for my revert and comment. However, i would strongly advise you to make edit summaries when you edit Wikipedia in order to let other contributors understand better your changes. Thank you. Happy editing.---Wikaviani ^{(talk) (contribs)} 14:41, 30 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Wikaviani: Thanks! I won't make any new edits to the paragraph in question before we've reached a conclusion on the talk page section that I started. Moponoly (talk) 17:59, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have recently shown interest in the

page-specific restrictions

, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the

Arbitration Committee's decision here

. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

And Israeli nuclear weapons article is such article please don't edit it. --Shrike (talk) 07:17, 2 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@

Power~enwiki: Noted ✔ Moponoly (talk) 18:01, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

@Debresser: Read ✔ Moponoly (talk) 18:02, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@

Flyer22 Reborn: What specifically was wrong about the edit? Moponoly (talk) 20:28, 31 August 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Nuclear weapons and Israel, you may be blocked from editing. This time i mean it, use the talk page or i'll have no other choice to report you ---Wikaviani ^{(talk) (contribs)} 14:30, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Wikaviani: Then maybe explain yourself on the actual talk page instead of reverting without explanation? "Controversial" doesn't actually mean anything, you need to be specific, which none of you guys are. If there is still no explanation within a few hours, I'll revert to my edit again. Moponoly (talk) 14:40, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Moponoly, you seem to misunderstand the burden of proof as per

WP:BRD. If you make a change and are reverted, you have to prove consensus for your change, not the other way around. Debresser (talk) 17:02, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply

]

@Moponoly: Check the talk page, i already explained you one of the reasons of my reverts. If you revert again witnout consensus, i'll find an admin to step in and make sure you stop since you're actually engaged in an edit war against numerous editors. You need to read Wiki policies more carefully in order to better understand how this community encyclopedia works.---Wikaviani ^{(talk) (contribs)} 18:12, 1 September 2018 (UTC)[reply]

You are suspected of